CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Safety and efficacy of bridging radiation therapy prior to CD19 CAR T for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Safety and efficacy of bridging radiation therapy prior to CD19 CAR T for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
在非霍奇金淋巴瘤 (NHL) 患者中,桥接放射治疗 (BRT) 越来越多地在 CD19 定向CAR-T 细胞 (CAR-T19) 之前使用。
然而,其对 CAR-T19 治疗结果的影响尚未确定。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估 CAR-T19 治疗之前 BRT 的安全性和有效性。从开始到 2024 年 10 月,我们在数据库中进行了全面的搜索。
我们确定了 18 项研究,涵盖 538 名在商业 CAR-T19 之前接受 BRT 的成年 NHL 患者。应用随机效应模型来探索荟萃分析结果。弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤是最常见的诊断 (73%),axicabtagene ciloleucel 是使用最多的产品 (67%)。37% 存在大体积疾病。在 76% 的病例中,BRT 的中位剂量为 30 Gy,全面递送至所有需要正电子发射断层扫描的疾病部位。CAR-T19 的总体缓解率为 78.9%。1 年时,无进展生存率为 54.6%,总生存率为 71.2%。80% 的病例出现全级细胞因子释放综合征 (CRS),而 39.4% 的病例出现全级免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征 (ICANS)。3/4级CRS率为3.6%,3/4级ICANS率为10.6%。敏感性分析包括针对大块疾病的研究,排除也接受全身桥接治疗的患者的研究,结果与主要研究结果一致。亚组荟萃回归显示,仅使用 BRT 的研究与使用联合治疗的研究结果相似。
总之,这项荟萃分析发现,在 CAR-T19 之前使用 BRT,无论是作为独立方法还是与全身治疗相结合,都不会增加毒性或损害 CAR-T19 治疗 NHL 的疗效。
此外,即使对于病情较大的患者,BRT 的使用也能降低 CRS 发生率。
Bridging radiation therapy (BRT) is increasingly utilized prior to CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART19) in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).
However, its impact on outcomes of CART19 therapy is not established.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the safety and efficacy of BRT prior to CART19 therapy. A comprehensive search was performed in databases from inception to October 2024.
We identified 18 studies encompassing 538 adult NHL patients who received BRT prior to commercial CART19. Random-effect models were applied to explore meta- analysis outcomes. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was the most common diagnosis (73%), and axicabtagene ciloleucel was the most utilized product (67%). Bulky disease was present in 37%. The median dose of BRT was 30 Gy delivered comprehensively to all sites of positron emission tomography-avid disease in 76% of cases. The overall response rate to CART19 was 78. 9%. At 1 year, the progression-free survival was 54. 6% while overall survival was 71.
2%. All-grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS) developed in 80% of cases while all-grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in 39. 4%. The rate of grade 3/4 CRS was 3. 6%, while that of grade 3/4 ICANS was 10. 6%.
Sensitivity analyses including studies with bulky disease and excluding studies with patients who also received systemic bridging therapy, demonstrated consistent results compared to the main study findings. Subgroup meta-regression showed similar results in studies that utilized BRT only compared to studies that utilized combined-modality treatment.
In conclusion, this meta-analysis found that BRT use prior to CART19, whether as a standalone approach or in combination with systemic therapy, does not increase toxicity or compromise the efficacy of CART19 therapy in NHL.
Furthermore, the use of BRT is associated with a low rate of CRS, even in patients with bulky disease.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。