← 返回

非霍奇金淋巴瘤 CD19 CAR-T 治疗前桥接放疗的安全性与疗效:系统综述与荟萃分析

英文原题:Safety and efficacy of bridging radiation therapy prior to CD19 CAR T for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

查看英文原题

Safety and efficacy of bridging radiation therapy prior to CD19 CAR T for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PubMed 2025/07/10(内容时间) Haematologica Q1 · IF 8.2(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

在非霍奇金淋巴瘤 (NHL) 患者中,桥接放射治疗 (BRT) 越来越多地在 CD19 定向CAR-T 细胞 (CAR-T19) 之前使用。

然而,其对 CAR-T19 治疗结果的影响尚未确定。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估 CAR-T19 治疗之前 BRT 的安全性和有效性。从开始到 2024 年 10 月,我们在数据库中进行了全面的搜索。

我们确定了 18 项研究,涵盖 538 名在商业 CAR-T19 之前接受 BRT 的成年 NHL 患者。应用随机效应模型来探索荟萃分析结果。弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤是最常见的诊断 (73%),axicabtagene ciloleucel 是使用最多的产品 (67%)。37% 存在大体积疾病。在 76% 的病例中,BRT 的中位剂量为 30 Gy,全面递送至所有需要正电子发射断层扫描的疾病部位。CAR-T19 的总体缓解率为 78.9%。1 年时,无进展生存率为 54.6%,总生存率为 71.2%。80% 的病例出现全级细胞因子释放综合征 (CRS),而 39.4% 的病例出现全级免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征 (ICANS)。3/4级CRS率为3.6%,3/4级ICANS率为10.6%。敏感性分析包括针对大块疾病的研究,排除也接受全身桥接治疗的患者的研究,结果与主要研究结果一致。亚组荟萃回归显示,仅使用 BRT 的研究与使用联合治疗的研究结果相似。

总之,这项荟萃分析发现,在 CAR-T19 之前使用 BRT,无论是作为独立方法还是与全身治疗相结合,都不会增加毒性或损害 CAR-T19 治疗 NHL 的疗效。

此外,即使对于病情较大的患者,BRT 的使用也能降低 CRS 发生率。

展开英文摘要原文

Bridging radiation therapy (BRT) is increasingly utilized prior to CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART19) in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

However, its impact on outcomes of CART19 therapy is not established.

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the safety and efficacy of BRT prior to CART19 therapy. A comprehensive search was performed in databases from inception to October 2024.

We identified 18 studies encompassing 538 adult NHL patients who received BRT prior to commercial CART19. Random-effect models were applied to explore meta- analysis outcomes. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was the most common diagnosis (73%), and axicabtagene ciloleucel was the most utilized product (67%). Bulky disease was present in 37%. The median dose of BRT was 30 Gy delivered comprehensively to all sites of positron emission tomography-avid disease in 76% of cases. The overall response rate to CART19 was 78. 9%. At 1 year, the progression-free survival was 54. 6% while overall survival was 71.

2%. All-grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS) developed in 80% of cases while all-grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in 39. 4%. The rate of grade 3/4 CRS was 3. 6%, while that of grade 3/4 ICANS was 10. 6%.

Sensitivity analyses including studies with bulky disease and excluding studies with patients who also received systemic bridging therapy, demonstrated consistent results compared to the main study findings. Subgroup meta-regression showed similar results in studies that utilized BRT only compared to studies that utilized combined-modality treatment.

In conclusion, this meta-analysis found that BRT use prior to CART19, whether as a standalone approach or in combination with systemic therapy, does not increase toxicity or compromise the efficacy of CART19 therapy in NHL.

Furthermore, the use of BRT is associated with a low rate of CRS, even in patients with bulky disease.

论文信息

作者
Alhomoud M、Ibrahim R、Demetres M、Rejeski K、Scordo M、Shouval R、Tix T、Martinet J
单位
Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. alhomom@mskcc.org.United States
文献类型
系统综述 · 荟萃分析
期刊
Haematologica2026 Mar 1
原文标识
PubMed 40637750 · DOI 10.3324/haematol.2025.287547