CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Assessment of established prognostic factors and artificial intelligence-based evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.
Assessment of established prognostic factors and artificial intelligence-based evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
基于 AI 的间质 TIL 评估作为预后标志物优于人工 TIL 评估。这种 AI 方法在与淋巴结比率和切缘近(<5 mm)等因素结合时,能稳健地预测生存。我们的发现可能改善风险分层,尤其是在晚期疾病中。
舌癌的传统风险评估依赖于临床病理参数。尽管 TIL 是有前景的预后标志物,但其评估缺乏标准化。本研究旨在验证已确立的预后因素,并引入一种基于 AI 的 TIL 评估方法。
我们分析了来自单一机构的139例舌癌病例(2010-2017年),以确定预后因素,并开发了一个用于TIL定量的AI模型。评估了包括AI和人工评估的TIL在内的临床病理特征。
AI评估的间质TIL比值在所有分期中均发挥保护作用,并显示出优于人工评估的区分能力(C-index:0.649 vs. 0.604,针对总生存期[OS]),且两种方法间具有高度一致性(组内相关系数=0.796)。在多变量分析中,纳入淋巴结比率、AI评估的间质TIL比值、浸润深度分级、神经周围侵犯、淋巴血管侵犯以及手术切缘近(<5 mm)的统计模型显示出更优的预后性能,具有出色的区分能力(OS曲线下面积[AUC]:0.851;无复发生存期[AUC]:0.826)。分期特异性分析显示,晚期患者受不良因素和间质TIL水平的显著影响,而早期患者显示出趋势但无统计学显著关联。
Traditional risk assessment for tongue cancer relies on clinicopathological parameters. Although tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are promising prognostic markers, their evaluation lacks standardization. This study aimed to validate established prognostic factors and introduce an artificial intelligence (AI)-based TIL assessment method.
We analyzed 139 tongue cancer cases from a single institution (2010-2017) to establish prognostic factors and developed an AI model for TIL quantification. Clinicopathological characteristics including AI- and manually assessed TILs were evaluated.
The AI-assessed stromal TIL ratio exerted protective effects across all stages and demonstrated superior discriminative capability compared to manual evaluation (C-index: 0.649 vs. 0.604 for overall survival [OS]), with substantial inter-method agreement (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.796). In the multivariate analysis, a statistical model incorporating the lymph node ratio, AI-assessed stromal TIL ratio, depth of invasion grade, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and a close surgical resection margin (<5 mm) showed superior prognostic performance, with excellent discriminative power (OS area under the curve [AUC]: 0.851; recurrence-free survival [AUC]: 0.826). Stage-specific analysis revealed that advanced-stage patients were significantly affected by adverse factors and stromal TIL levels, whereas early stage patients showed trends but no statistically significant associations.
AI-based stromal TIL assessment outperformed manual TIL assessment as a prognostic marker. This AI approach robustly predicts survival when combined with factors such as the lymph node ratio and a close resection margin status (<5 mm). Our findings may enhance risk stratification, particularly in advanced-stage disease.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。