← 返回

口腔舌鳞状细胞癌中已确立预后因素的评估及基于人工智能的 TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)评价

英文原题:Assessment of established prognostic factors and artificial intelligence-based evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

查看英文原题

Assessment of established prognostic factors and artificial intelligence-based evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

PubMed 2025/07/03(内容时间) Oral Oncol Q1 · IF 4(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

基于 AI 的间质 TIL 评估作为预后标志物优于人工 TIL 评估。这种 AI 方法在与淋巴结比率和切缘近(<5 mm)等因素结合时,能稳健地预测生存。我们的发现可能改善风险分层,尤其是在晚期疾病中。

研究思路结论见上方概要

舌癌的传统风险评估依赖于临床病理参数。尽管 TIL 是有前景的预后标志物,但其评估缺乏标准化。本研究旨在验证已确立的预后因素,并引入一种基于 AI 的 TIL 评估方法。

我们分析了来自单一机构的139例舌癌病例(2010-2017年),以确定预后因素,并开发了一个用于TIL定量的AI模型。评估了包括AI和人工评估的TIL在内的临床病理特征。

AI评估的间质TIL比值在所有分期中均发挥保护作用,并显示出优于人工评估的区分能力(C-index:0.649 vs. 0.604,针对总生存期[OS]),且两种方法间具有高度一致性(组内相关系数=0.796)。在多变量分析中,纳入淋巴结比率、AI评估的间质TIL比值、浸润深度分级、神经周围侵犯、淋巴血管侵犯以及手术切缘近(<5 mm)的统计模型显示出更优的预后性能,具有出色的区分能力(OS曲线下面积[AUC]:0.851;无复发生存期[AUC]:0.826)。分期特异性分析显示,晚期患者受不良因素和间质TIL水平的显著影响,而早期患者显示出趋势但无统计学显著关联。

展开英文摘要原文

Traditional risk assessment for tongue cancer relies on clinicopathological parameters. Although tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are promising prognostic markers, their evaluation lacks standardization. This study aimed to validate established prognostic factors and introduce an artificial intelligence (AI)-based TIL assessment method.

We analyzed 139 tongue cancer cases from a single institution (2010-2017) to establish prognostic factors and developed an AI model for TIL quantification. Clinicopathological characteristics including AI- and manually assessed TILs were evaluated.

The AI-assessed stromal TIL ratio exerted protective effects across all stages and demonstrated superior discriminative capability compared to manual evaluation (C-index: 0.649 vs. 0.604 for overall survival [OS]), with substantial inter-method agreement (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.796). In the multivariate analysis, a statistical model incorporating the lymph node ratio, AI-assessed stromal TIL ratio, depth of invasion grade, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and a close surgical resection margin (<5 mm) showed superior prognostic performance, with excellent discriminative power (OS area under the curve [AUC]: 0.851; recurrence-free survival [AUC]: 0.826). Stage-specific analysis revealed that advanced-stage patients were significantly affected by adverse factors and stromal TIL levels, whereas early stage patients showed trends but no statistically significant associations.

AI-based stromal TIL assessment outperformed manual TIL assessment as a prognostic marker. This AI approach robustly predicts survival when combined with factors such as the lymph node ratio and a close resection margin status (<5 mm). Our findings may enhance risk stratification, particularly in advanced-stage disease.

论文信息

作者
Lee J、Fan M、Jo D、Lee J、Song JS、Lee HJ、Choi SH、Nam SY
第一作者单位
Department of Pathology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.South Korea
通讯作者单位
Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: kjc@amc.seoul.kr.South Korea
期刊
Oral oncology2025 Aug
原文标识
PubMed 40609405 · DOI 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107448