← 返回

B 细胞淋巴瘤中 CAR-T 与双特异性抗体感染风险的比较:系统综述与荟萃分析

英文原题:Comparative infection risk in CAR T vs bispecific antibodies in B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

查看英文原题

Comparative infection risk in CAR T vs bispecific antibodies in B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PubMed 2025/12/09(内容时间) Blood Adv Q1 · IF 7.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

CD3xCD20双特异性抗体(BsAb)治疗和靶向CD19的CAR-T 细胞治疗(CAR-T)是新型免疫疗法,在B细胞淋巴瘤中显示出显著疗效,但也伴随显著的发病率和死亡率,包括感染。本meta分析比较了商业获批的CAR-T 与BsAb治疗在B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤(B-NHL)患者中的感染发生率。

我们对评估商业获批的CAR-T 和BsAb用于B-NHL患者的前瞻性试验进行了系统综述。共纳入25项研究,包含3202例患者。

我们使用随机效应模型评估全级别感染、3级及以上感染和感染相关死亡率,计算每例患者和每患者-月的合并发生率。CAR-T 和BsAb的每例患者全级别感染发生率相似(0.44 vs 0.54;P = .18),但BsAb的每患者-月感染发生率更高(0.0397 vs 0.0167;P = .0012)。同样,CAR-T 和BsAb的每例患者3级及以上感染发生率相似(0.16 vs 0.22;P = .08),而BsAb的每患者-月3级及以上感染发生率更高(0.0165 vs 0.0069;P = .0003)。CAR-T 和BsAb产品的每例患者感染相关死亡率相似(0.04 vs 0.03;P = .26),每患者-月感染相关死亡率也相似(0.0023 vs 0.0022;P = .96)。

我们的发现提示,接受BsAb治疗的患者随着时间推移感染负担可能增加,尤其是接受无限期治疗的患者。

展开英文摘要原文

CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody (BsAb) therapy and CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T) are novel immunotherapies that have shown impressive efficacy in B-cell lymphomas, but also come with significant morbidity and mortality, including infections. This meta-analysis compares rates of infections between commercially approved CAR T and BsAb therapy in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL).

We conducted a systematic review for prospective trials assessing commercially approved CAR T and BsAbs in patients with B-NHL. Twenty-five studies comprising 3202 patients were included in the analysis.

We used random effects models to evaluate all-grade infections, grade 3+ infections, and infection-related mortality, calculating both pooled rates per patient and per patient-month. While CAR T and BsAbs had similar rates of all-grade infections per patient (0. 44 vs 0. 54; P = . 18), BsAbs had a higher rate of infection per patient-month (0. 0397 vs 0. 0167; P = . 0012).

Similarly, CAR T and BsAbs had similar rates of grade 3+ infections per patient (0. 16 vs 0. 22; P = . 08), while BsAbs had a higher rate of grade 3+ infections per patient-month (0. 0165 vs 0. 0069; P = . 0003). CAR T and BsAb products had similar rates of infection-related mortality per patient (0. 04 vs 0. 03; P = . 26) and per patient-month (0. 0023 vs 0. 0022; P = . 96).

Our findings point to the potential increased burden of infections over time in patients receiving BsAb therapy, particularly for patients on indefinite therapy.

论文信息

作者
van Besien H、Easwar N、Demetres M、Pasciolla M、Shore T、Leonard J、Barker J、Martin P
单位
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY.United States
文献类型
系统综述 · 荟萃分析 · 对照研究
期刊
Blood advances2025 Dec 9
原文标识
PubMed 40590871 · DOI 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016291