CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Comparative infection risk in CAR T vs bispecific antibodies in B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Comparative infection risk in CAR T vs bispecific antibodies in B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CD3xCD20双特异性抗体(BsAb)治疗和靶向CD19的CAR-T 细胞治疗(CAR-T)是新型免疫疗法,在B细胞淋巴瘤中显示出显著疗效,但也伴随显著的发病率和死亡率,包括感染。本meta分析比较了商业获批的CAR-T 与BsAb治疗在B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤(B-NHL)患者中的感染发生率。
我们对评估商业获批的CAR-T 和BsAb用于B-NHL患者的前瞻性试验进行了系统综述。共纳入25项研究,包含3202例患者。
我们使用随机效应模型评估全级别感染、3级及以上感染和感染相关死亡率,计算每例患者和每患者-月的合并发生率。CAR-T 和BsAb的每例患者全级别感染发生率相似(0.44 vs 0.54;P = .18),但BsAb的每患者-月感染发生率更高(0.0397 vs 0.0167;P = .0012)。同样,CAR-T 和BsAb的每例患者3级及以上感染发生率相似(0.16 vs 0.22;P = .08),而BsAb的每患者-月3级及以上感染发生率更高(0.0165 vs 0.0069;P = .0003)。CAR-T 和BsAb产品的每例患者感染相关死亡率相似(0.04 vs 0.03;P = .26),每患者-月感染相关死亡率也相似(0.0023 vs 0.0022;P = .96)。
我们的发现提示,接受BsAb治疗的患者随着时间推移感染负担可能增加,尤其是接受无限期治疗的患者。
CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody (BsAb) therapy and CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T) are novel immunotherapies that have shown impressive efficacy in B-cell lymphomas, but also come with significant morbidity and mortality, including infections. This meta-analysis compares rates of infections between commercially approved CAR T and BsAb therapy in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL).
We conducted a systematic review for prospective trials assessing commercially approved CAR T and BsAbs in patients with B-NHL. Twenty-five studies comprising 3202 patients were included in the analysis.
We used random effects models to evaluate all-grade infections, grade 3+ infections, and infection-related mortality, calculating both pooled rates per patient and per patient-month. While CAR T and BsAbs had similar rates of all-grade infections per patient (0. 44 vs 0. 54; P = . 18), BsAbs had a higher rate of infection per patient-month (0. 0397 vs 0. 0167; P = . 0012).
Similarly, CAR T and BsAbs had similar rates of grade 3+ infections per patient (0. 16 vs 0. 22; P = . 08), while BsAbs had a higher rate of grade 3+ infections per patient-month (0. 0165 vs 0. 0069; P = . 0003). CAR T and BsAb products had similar rates of infection-related mortality per patient (0. 04 vs 0. 03; P = . 26) and per patient-month (0. 0023 vs 0. 0022; P = . 96).
Our findings point to the potential increased burden of infections over time in patients receiving BsAb therapy, particularly for patients on indefinite therapy.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。