← 返回

SOHO 最新进展与后续问题 | 骨髓瘤中的晚期/延迟 ASCT

英文原题:SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Late/Deferred ASCT in Myeloma.

查看英文原题

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Late/Deferred ASCT in Myeloma.

PubMed 2025/06/05(内容时间) Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk Q1 · IF 4.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

高剂量美法仑联合自体干细胞移植(HDM-ASCT)仍然是适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者的标准治疗,随机研究数据显示,与不移植方案相比,移植可带来无进展生存期(PFS)获益。

然而,随着三联和四联方案以及多种新型治疗方法显著提高疗效,该场景下的总生存期(OS)不断延长,治疗决策中战略考量至关重要,同时需要采取整体性方法,将患者的偏好和需求纳入考量。

在此背景下,延迟HDM-ASCT的策略正被越来越多地考虑,其背后有多种驱动因素。延迟HDM-ASCT的理由包括与接受移植相关的急性和长期毒性及后遗症,例如HDM后突变负荷增加以及继发性白血病风险升高。鉴于这些不利因素,考虑延迟HDM-ASCT的另一个驱动因素是,在不同患者亚组中观察到PFS获益幅度存在显著差异。

此外,尽管PFS获益显著,但在三联诱导/巩固治疗以及复发时多种有效治疗选择的时代,随机研究并未显示OS获益。此外,针对NDMM的新兴标准治疗四联诱导方案已证明可获得极高比例的微小残留病(MRD)阴性缓解率,从而促进了潜在的免HDM-ASCT、MRD适应性治疗策略。

最后,诸如嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞和双特异性抗体疗法等新型疗法正开始作为适合移植患者的初始替代方案进行研究。因此,与这些多重驱动因素相关,晚期或延迟的HDM-ASCT正逐渐成为部分适合移植的NDMM患者的一种潜在标准治疗方式。

展开英文摘要原文

High-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplant (HDM-ASCT) remains a standard-of-care for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), with data from randomized studies demonstrating progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with transplant versus nontransplant approaches.

However, with increasing overall survival (OS) in this setting, associated with the substantial efficacy of triplet and quadruplet regimens and multiple novel treatment approaches, strategic considerations are key, together with a holistic approach taking into account patients' preferences and needs, for treatment decision-making. In this context, the approach of deferring HDM-ASCT is being increasingly considered, associated with various drivers.

Rationales for deferring HDM-ASCT include the acute and long-term toxicities and sequelae associated with undergoing transplant, such as the increased mutational burden and elevated risk of secondary leukemia arising following HDM. Given these downsides, another driver for considering deferred HDM-ASCT is that substantial variability in magnitude of PFS benefit has been seen across patient subgroups.

Furthermore, despite significant PFS benefit, randomized studies have not shown OS benefit in the era of triplet induction/consolidation and multiple active treatment options at relapse.

Additionally, very high rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative responses have been demonstrated with emerging standard-of-care quadruplet induction regimens for NDMM, facilitating potential HDM-ASCT-sparing, MRD-adapted treatment approaches.

Finally, novel therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell and bispecific antibody therapies are beginning to be investigated as upfront alternatives in transplant-eligible patients.

Thus, associated with these multiple drivers, late or deferred HDM-ASCT is emerging as a potential standard-of-care approach for select transplant-eligible patients with NDMM.

论文信息

作者
Mo CC、Liu Y、Hartley-Brown MA、Nadeem O、Midha S、Richardson PG
第一作者单位
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Jerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.Italy
通讯作者单位
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Jerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Electronic address: paul_richardson@dfci.harvard.edu.Italy
文献类型
综述
期刊
Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2025 Nov
原文标识
PubMed 40581511 · DOI 10.1016/j.clml.2025.06.003