← 返回

高级别胶质瘤的免疫治疗

英文原题:Immunotherapy for High-Grade Gliomas.

查看英文原题

Immunotherapy for High-Grade Gliomas.

PubMed 2025/05/31(内容时间) Cancers (Basel) Q2 · IF 4.8(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

高级别胶质瘤(HGGs),尤其是胶质母细胞瘤(GBM),与极高的死亡率和不可避免的复发相关。在考虑这些毁灭性疾病的新治疗方案时,免疫治疗是有前景的候选方案。免疫治疗已在中枢神经系统外的多种晚期肿瘤中显示出疗效,突显了这些药物在治疗HGGs中的潜在作用。然而,免疫治疗疗效面临的多种挑战在实践中削弱了治疗获益,包括局部和全身性免疫抑制、肿瘤内异质性,以及多种内在和获得性耐药机制。在过去30年中,已评估了多种免疫治疗亚类对HGGs的获益。

我们进行了PubMed检索,查找过去30年内开展的随机临床试验,这些试验评估了以下免疫治疗药物对高级别胶质瘤的作用:免疫检查点抑制剂、疫苗、溶瘤病毒、细胞因子和CAR-T 细胞。本综述对过去二十年来塑造高级别胶质瘤免疫治疗格局的关键临床前和临床试验进行了批判性分析。结果/结论:在迄今探索的不同免疫治疗方法和方法学中,一个反复出现的主题浮现出来:尽管具有令人信服的概念基础的治疗策略不断处于开发中,甚至在临床前和早期试验中显示出获益,但更大规模和更晚期的试验始终未能产生相应显著的结果。迄今为止,尚无大规模临床试验显示出足以改变实践的充分获益。对既往研究工作的优势与不足进行持续严格的评估,优化治疗开发与实施,以及创新性地设计联合治疗方案,这些将共同成为未来治疗进展不可或缺的组成部分。

展开英文摘要原文

Background: High-grade gliomas (HGGs), particularly glioblastoma (GBM), are associated with exceptionally high mortality and inevitable recurrence. In considering novel treatment options for these devastating diseases, immunotherapies represent promising candidates. Immunotherapies have demonstrated efficacy for several advanced tumors outside the central nervous system, highlighting a potential role for these agents in treating HGGs.

However, multiple challenges to immunotherapy efficacy have tempered therapeutic benefit in practice, including local and systemic immunosuppression, intratumoral heterogeneity, and various mechanisms of intrinsic and acquired resistance. In the past 30 years, diverse immunotherapeutic subclasses have been assessed for benefit against HGGs. Methods: We performed a PubMed search for randomized clinical trials performed within the last 30 years evaluating the following immunotherapy agents for high-grade gliomas: immune checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, oncologic viruses, cytokines, and CAR T-cells. The present review offers a critical analysis of key pre-clinical and clinical trials that have shaped the immunotherapy landscape for high-grade gliomas over the past two decades.

Results/Conclusions: Across the different immunotherapeutic methods and modalities explored thus far, a recurring theme emerges: while therapeutic strategies with a compelling conceptual basis are continually under development and even demonstrate a benefit in preclinical and early-phase trials, larger and later-phase trials consistently fail to produce concordantly significant outcomes.

To date, no large-scale clinical trial has demonstrated a benefit of sufficient consequence to change practice. Continued critical appraisal of the strengths and pitfalls of prior investigative work, optimization of treatment development and delivery, and innovative approaches to combination therapy design will collectively be integral to future therapeutic advancement.

论文信息

作者
Karbhari N、Frechette KM、Burns TC、Parney IF、Campian JL、Breen WG、Sener UT、Lehrer EJ
第一作者单位
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.United States
通讯作者单位
Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.United States
文献类型
综述
期刊
Cancers2025 May 31
原文标识
PubMed 40507329 · DOI 10.3390/cancers17111849