← 返回

mosunetuzumab 与 CAR-T 细胞疗法在复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤中的成本效果

英文原题:Cost effectiveness of mosunetuzumab and CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.

查看英文原题

Cost effectiveness of mosunetuzumab and CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.

PubMed 2025/06/09(内容时间) Leuk Lymphoma Q3 · IF 2.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

靶向T细胞的疗法,包括mosunetuzumab(mosun)、阿基仑赛(axi-cel)和替沙妥司他(tisa-cel),已获FDA批准用于三线及以上复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)。目前没有头对头临床试验数据可比较这些疗法的疗效。这些产品在给药方式、住院要求和毒性特征方面各不相同,影响治疗选择。我们从美国支付方角度建立覆盖1至10年的Markov模型,参数来自临床试验、健康效用和计费成本。10年基础情景分析显示,每名患者接受mosun比axi-cel多获得67,654美元净货币收益(NMB),比tisa-cel多获得111,709美元。这些发现提示,按每质量调整生命年支付意愿阈值15万美元计算,mosun具有成本效益。

展开英文摘要原文

T cell redirecting therapies, including mosunetuzumab (mosun), axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), are FDA-approved for relapsed refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) in the 3rd line and beyond. There's no head-to-head clinical trial data to compare their effectiveness. These products differ in administration, hospitalization requirements, and toxicity profiles, impacting therapy selection.

We developed a Markov model spanning one to 10 years from a US payer perspective, using parameters from clinical trials, quality utilities, and billing costs.

Our base case analysis over 10 years showed that mosun provided $67,654 more Net Monetary Benefit (NMB) per patient than axi-cel and $111,709 more than tisa-cel.

These findings suggest mosun is cost-effective at a $150,000 willingness-to-pay per QALY.

论文信息

作者
Lin MH、Weiss J、Phillips TJ、Sano D、Carty SA、Wilcox R、Ghosh M、Ahmed I
第一作者单位
School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.United States
通讯作者单位
Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.United States
期刊
Leukemia & lymphoma2025 Oct
原文标识
PubMed 40488632 · DOI 10.1080/10428194.2025.2506498