CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Heterogeneity and efficacy of immunotherapy in multiple cancer: insights from a meta-analysis.
Heterogeneity and efficacy of immunotherapy in multiple cancer: insights from a meta-analysis.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
本荟萃分析为免疫治疗尤其是 CAR-T 在癌症治疗中的潜力提供了有价值的见解。
免疫疗法通过促进机体免疫系统更有效地识别和清除癌细胞,已被视为癌症治疗的一项重大进展。不同于传统疗法,免疫疗法可增强人体免疫系统的天然能力。CAR-T 细胞疗法对患者T细胞进行基因修饰,使其更好地识别和攻击癌细胞。截至目前,CAR-T 疗法治疗某些白血病和淋巴瘤显示出特别好的前景,凸显了免疫疗法的变革潜力。
我们检索了PubMed、中国知网(CNKI)和万方数据库,收集截至2025年1月符合条件的研究。评估主要结局,包括完全缓解率(CRR)、客观缓解率(ORR)、死亡率(DR)及其他不良反应;并分析不同癌症类型、来源及生存结局亚组的CRR、ORR和DR。数据库检索初步发现649项研究;去除重复文献和非临床癌症研究后,纳入32项研究。合并数据分别包括819例患者的ORR、843例患者的CRR及868例患者的死亡事件。纳入研究中,24项报告ORR数据,ORR为84.86%(695/819),异质性较低(OR 0.87,95%置信区间[CI] 0.80–0.91,P<0.01,I²=61%);24项研究报告CRR为65.30%(491/843),异质性显著(OR 0.58,95% CI 0.43–0.72,P<0.01,I²=84%);27项研究报告死亡率为23.73%(206/868),异质性显著(OR 0.19,95% CI 0.11–0.32,P<0.01,I²=77%)。按癌症类型进行亚组分析发现,多发性骨髓瘤ORR最高,为86.77%(400/461),其次为白血病84.92%(259/305)和淋巴瘤67.92%(36/53)。同时,按病例来源观察到的异质性提示,中国病例的ORR、CRR和生存率显著高于美国病例。
本荟萃分析为免疫疗法,尤其是CAR-T 治疗癌症的潜力提供了有价值见解。研究结果显示,免疫疗法治疗多种癌症的疗效和安全性不同,客观缓解率亦各异。仍需开展更多不同人群的临床试验,以优化其在未来癌症治疗和精准医疗中的疗效。
Immunotherapy has been recognized as a significant advancement in cancer treatment by promoting the body's immune system to identify and eliminate cancer cells more effectively. Unlike conventional therapies, immunotherapy can enhance the natural capabilities of human immune system. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy involves genetical-modified T-cells from patients to better catch and attack cancer cells. Up to date, CAR-T therapy has shown particular promise in treating certain types of leukemia and lymphoma, highlighting the transformative potential of immunotherapy.
Literature data search using PubMed, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched to collect eligible studies up to January 2025. The primary outcomes of complete response rate (CRR), objective response rate (ORR), dead rate (DR), and other adverse reactions were evaluated. Secondary outcomes (CRR, ORR, and DR) of subgroup analysis from different cancer types, origins, and outcomes for survival rate were analyzed for our final results. A total of 649 studies were initially identified through database searching. After removing duplicates and non-clinical cancer studies, 32 eligible studies were included in this work. The pooled data included 819 patients for objective response rate (ORR), 843 patients for complete response rate (CRR), and 868 patients for dead event. In the included studies, 24 reported ORR data, revealing an objective response rate of 84.86% (695/819) with little heterogeneity (OR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.91, P = < 0.01, I 2 = 61%); 24 studies showed a CRR of 65.30% (491/843) with significant heterogeneity (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43-0.72, P < 0.01, I 2 = 84%); 27 studies showed a mortality rate of 23.73% (206/868) with significant heterogeneity (OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.11-0.32, P < 0.01, I 2 = 77%). Subgroup analysis based on cancer type revealed that ORR was higher in multiple myeloma (86.77%, 400/461) compared with leukemia (84.92%, 259/305) and lymphoma (67.92%, 36/53). In parallel, heterogeneity observed based on case origins suggested that Chinese cases showed significantly higher ORR, CRR, and survival rates compared with American ones.
This meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the potential of immunotherapy, particularly CAR-T, in cancer treatment. Findings showed the different efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in treating multiple cancers, with various objective response rates. Continued studies from more trials with different populations are needed to optimize their efficacy in further cancer treatment and precision medicine.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。