CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Inequalities in CAR T-cell therapy access for US patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL: a SEER-Medicare data analysis.
Inequalities in CAR T-cell therapy access for US patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL: a SEER-Medicare data analysis.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法对弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)及其他恶性肿瘤患者具有潜在治愈作用,但其在Medicare患者,尤其是弱势群体中的可及性仍不确定。
本研究旨在评估接受三线及以上(3L+)治疗的Medicare DLBCL患者CAR-T 使用情况,重点关注可及性差异及其对临床结局的影响。利用2007至2020年监测、流行病学和最终结局(SEER)-Medicare数据,采用多变量逻辑回归评估患者特征及其与授权治疗中心(ATC)距离对CAR-T 可及性的影响。2017至2020年间,SEER-Medicare数据中有2,241例患者接受3L+ DLBCL治疗,其中122例(5.4%)接受CAR-T。CAR-T 接受者合并多种疾病的可能性较低(比值比[OR] 0.904;P=0.001),但居住在较高收入地区的可能性较高(OR 1.176;P=0.004)。如果“可及性差”州患者至最近ATC的距离(平均104.4英里)降至“可及性较好”州的平均距离(34.2英里),接受CAR-T 的患者人数可增加37.6%(占比从6.6%升至9.1%;P<0.001)。这些发现凸显CAR-T 使用存在显著差异,受地理和社会经济因素驱动。解决这些障碍可显著促进CAR-T 疗法公平可及并改善服务不足人群的结局,提示需采取有针对性的干预措施以减少地理和系统性医疗障碍。
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has shown curative potential for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and other malignancies, but its accessibility among Medicare patients, particularly in disadvantaged populations, remains uncertain.
This study aims to assess CAR-T use among Medicare patients with DLBCL receiving third-line or later (3L+) treatment, focusing on access disparities and their impact on clinical outcomes. Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data from 2007 to 2020, multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate patient characteristics and the effects of distance to authorized treatment centers (ATCs) on CAR-T access. Between 2017 and 2020, 2241 patients were treated for 3L+ DLBCL in the SEER-Medicare data, of whom 122 (5.
4%) received CAR-Ts. CAR-T recipients were less likely to have multiple comorbidities (odds ratio [OR], 0. 904; P = . 001) but more likely to live in higher income areas (OR, 1. 176; P = . 004). If distance to the nearest ATC for "poor-access" states (average distance to ATC, 104. 4 miles) decreased to the average distance in "better-access" states (34. 2 miles), there would be a 37. 6% increase in number of patients receiving CAR-Ts (6. 6%-9. 1%; P < . 001).
These findings highlight substantial disparities in CAR-T use, driven by geographic and socioeconomic factors. Addressing these barriers could significantly enhance equitable access to CAR-T therapy and improve outcomes for underserved populations, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to reduce geographic and systemic barriers to care.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。