CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:TRANSCAR: real-world outcomes of CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory transformed indolent lymphomas.
TRANSCAR: real-world outcomes of CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory transformed indolent lymphomas.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
抗CD19嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗复发/难治性侵袭性大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)效果显著,但LBCL组织学亚型在CAR-T 治疗背景下的预后价值尚不明确。本文报告了转化型惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(TriNHL;110例)与新发LBCL(391例)患者接受CAR-T 治疗后的预后价值。病例由法国DESCAR-T 登记的4家中心提供,并经专科病理复核(LYMPHOPATH)确认。按1:1倾向评分匹配后,共170例患者(TriNHL和新发LBCL各85例)。TriNHL和LBCL患者中位随访分别为19.4个月(95% CI 12.0–25.1)和18.5个月(95% CI 13.8–24.8)。TriNHL组1年无进展生存率显著高于新发LBCL组(55.8%,95% CI 43.6–66.4;对比31.7%,95% CI 21.4–42.6;HR .54,95% CI .36–.82,P=.0034)。TriNHL组最佳总缓解率和完全缓解率分别为82.4%和63.5%,高于新发LBCL组的63.5%和50.6%。TriNHL组1年总生存率也更高(72.1%,95% CI 59.6–81.4;对比50.7%,95% CI 38.2–62.0;P=.031)。逆概率加权分析得到相似结果。两组毒性无差异。
总之,匹配比较研究显示,CAR-T 治疗TriNHL的疗效高于新发LBCL,且毒性相当。
Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have shown impressive results in the treatment of relapsed/refractory aggressive large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs).
However, the prognostic value of the LBCL histological subtype in the context of CAR T-cell therapy is unclear.
Here, we report the prognostic value of transformed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (TriNHL; N = 110) confirmed by an expert pathological review (LYMPHOPATH) vs de novo LBCL (N = 391) in the context of CAR T-cell therapy from 4 centers of the French DESCAR-T registry. After 1:1 propensity score matching (n = 170, 85 patients with TriNHL and 85 patients with de novo LBCL), the median follow-up was 19. 4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12. 0-25. 1) for patients with TriNHL and 18. 5 months (95% CI, 13. 8-24. 8) for patients with LBCL. The 1-year progression-free survival rate was significantly better (55. 8%; 95% CI, 43. 6-66.
4) in the TriNHL group than in the de novo LBCL group (31. 7%; 95% CI, 21. 4-42. 6; hazard ratio, 0. 54; 95% CI, 0. 36-0. 82; P = . 0034). The best overall response rate and complete response rate were 82. 4% and 63. 5%, respectively, whereas they were 63. 5% and 50. 6%, respectively, for the TriNHL group compared with the de novo LBCL group.
The 1-year overall survival was also longer in the TriNHL group than in the de novo LBCL group (72. 1%, [95% CI, 59. 6-81. 4] vs 50. 7%, [95% CI, 38. 2-62. 0]; P = . 031). Similar findings were found via an inverse probability weighting statistical approach. No difference was observed in terms of toxicity.
In conclusion, our matched-comparison study revealed a greater efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy, with a toxicity profile for patients with TriNHL comparable with that for patients with LBCL.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。