← 返回

[(18)F]FAPI-04 PET/CT 在疑似复发性肝细胞癌中的诊断效能:与增强 CT/MRI 的前瞻性比较

英文原题:Diagnostic performance of [(18)F]FAPI-04 PET/CT in suspected recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: prospective comparison with contrast-enhanced CT/MRI.

查看英文原题

Diagnostic performance of [(18)F]FAPI-04 PET/CT in suspected recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: prospective comparison with contrast-enhanced CT/MRI.

PubMed 2025/04/15(内容时间) Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Q1 · IF 7.6(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

[ 18 F]FAPI-04 PET/CT 与 Ce-CT/MRI 联合应用显著提高了鉴别复发性 HCC 与 TILs 的诊断灵敏度、特异度和准确度。[ 18 F]FAPI-04 PET 可能是检测复发性 HCC 的一种有前景的影像学方法。

研究思路结论见上方概要

评估[ 18 F]FAPI-04 PET/CT在鉴别肝细胞癌(HCC)治疗后复发与治疗诱导病灶(TILs)中的诊断效能,并与增强CT/MRI(Ce-CT/MRI)进行比较。

疑似HCC切除或局部区域治疗后复发的患者,接受了Ce-CT/MRI和[18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT检查,被前瞻性纳入研究。对于每位患者或每个病灶,Ce-CT/MRI和[18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT均被赋予三点量表评分(阳性、阴性或可疑)。以组织病理学或影像学随访作为参考标准,通过McNemar检验比较Ce-CT/MRI、[18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT及其联合应用的诊断效能。分析[18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT得出的病灶最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)和病灶-本底比值(LBR),并计算区分HCC复发与TILs的截断值。

共分析44例患者、129个病灶,其中31例患者(91个病灶)被证实为复发性HCC,38个病灶为TILs。基于病灶的分析显示,与单独Ce-CT/MRI和[18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT相比,[18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT联合Ce-CT/MRI表现出更高的敏感性(86.8% vs. 70.3% vs. 72.5%)、特异性(89.5% vs. 42.1% vs. 52.6%)和准确性(87.6% vs. 62.0% vs. 66.7%)(均P < 0.001)。该联合方案改变了22.7%患者的治疗管理。在半定量分析中,HCC复发灶(n = 91)中[18F]FAPI-04 PET的SUV max和LBR显著高于TILs(n = 38)(SUV max:8.1 vs. 3.65,P < 0.001;LBR:5.4 vs. 1.9,P < 0.001)。使用SUV max截断值5.1和LBR截断值2.3时,[18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT在区分复发性HCC与TILs方面表现出高敏感性和特异性,分别为83.5%、78.9%和96.2%、63.2%。

展开英文摘要原文

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of [ 18 F]FAPI-04 PET/CT in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence from treatment-induced lesions (TILs) after therapy and compare it with contrast-enhanced CT/MRI (Ce-CT/MRI).

Patients with suspected HCC recurrence after resection or local-regional therapy, who underwent Ce-CT/MRI and [ 18 F]FAPI-04 PET/CT, were prospectively enrolled. For each patient or lesion, a three-point-scale (positive, negative, or equivocal) was assigned to Ce-CT/MRI and [ 18 F]FAPI-04 PET/CT. The diagnostic performances of Ce-CT/MRI, [ 18 F]FAPI-04 PET/CT, and their combination were compared by McNemar's test, with histopathology or radiographic follow-up as a reference standard. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max ) and lesion-to-background ratio (LBR) of lesions derived from [ 18 F]FAPI-04 PET/CT were analyzed, and the cut-off points for distinguishing between HCC recurrence and TILs were calculated.

A total of 44 patients with 129 lesions were analyzed, of which 31 patients (91 lesions) were proved to be recurrent HCC and 38 lesions were TILs. On lesion-based analysis, the combination of [ 18 F]FAPI-04 PET/CT with Ce-CT/MRI demonstrated superior sensitivity (86.8% vs. 70.3% vs. 72.5%), specificity (89.5% vs. 42.1% vs. 52.6%), and accuracy (87.6% vs. 62.0% vs. 66.7%) compared to Ce-CT/MRI and [ 18 F]FAPI-04 PET/CT alone (all P < 0.001). The combination altered therapy management in 22.7% of patients. On semiquantitative analysis, the SUV max and LBR of [ 18 F]FAPI-04 PET in HCC recurrence (n = 91) were significantly higher than those in TILs (n = 38) (SUV max : 8.1 vs. 3.65, P < 0.001; LBR: 5.4 vs. 1.9, P < 0.001). Using cutoff points of 5.1 for SUV max and 2.3 for LBR, [ 18 F]FAPI-04 PET/CT exhibited high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating recurrent HCC from TILs, with 83.5%, 78.9% and 96.2%, 63.2%, respectively.

The combination of [ 18 F]FAPI-04 PET/CT with Ce-CT/MRI significantly improved diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in differentiating recurrent HCC from TILs. [ 18 F]FAPI-04 PET may be a promising imaging modality in detecting recurrent HCC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05485792.

论文信息

作者
Liang J、Weng S、Zhang J、Jiang S、Li W、Li S、Rong J、Liu H
第一作者单位
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, 78 Hengzhigang Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510095, P. R. China.China
通讯作者单位
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, 78 Hengzhigang Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510095, P. R. China. zhanglinqi0909@163.com.China
文献类型
临床试验 · 对照研究
期刊
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025 Sep
原文标识
PubMed 40232335 · DOI 10.1007/s00259-025-07273-4