← 返回

自体移植或 CAR-T 作为挽救治疗后缓解的 MYC 重排大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的巩固治疗选择

英文原题:Autologous Transplant or CAR-T as Consolidation Options in MYC Rearranged Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients in Remission After Salvage Treatments.

查看英文原题

Autologous Transplant or CAR-T as Consolidation Options in MYC Rearranged Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients in Remission After Salvage Treatments.

PubMed 2025/04/15(内容时间) Am J Hematol Q1 · IF 9.4(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

近期研究显示,CAR-T 细胞治疗伴MYC重排(R-MYC)的复发大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)有效;然而,对于挽救治疗后达到完全或部分缓解(CR/PR)的患者,CAR-T 与自体造血细胞移植(auto-HCT)的比较数据有限。研究者利用国际血液与骨髓移植研究中心登记数据,比较挽救治疗后达到CR/PR并接受CAR-T 或auto-HCT的R-MYC LBCL(包括双重及三重打击淋巴瘤)患者临床结局。252例患者中,98例接受auto-HCT、154例接受CAR-T。多变量分析显示,与auto-HCT相比,CAR-T 与总生存期(OS)显著较差相关(风险比[HR] 2.09,95% CI 1.38–3.15,P<.001)。

两组无进展生存期(PFS)(HR 1.21,95% CI .81–1.8,P=.36)、复发风险(HR 1.1,95% CI .71–1.69,P=.68)和非复发死亡率(NRM;HR 1.74,95% CI .64–4.7,P=.28)无差异;复发后生存则auto-HCT优于CAR-T(HR 1.93,95% CI 1.21–3.06,P=.01)。在倾向评分匹配分析中,校正两队列特征差异后,OS(HR 1.72,95% CI .92–3.21,P=.09)、PFS(HR 1.04,95% CI .64–1.68,P=.88)、NRM(HR 1.22,95% CI .35–4.2,P=.76)、复发(HR .93,95% CI .54–1.6,P=.8)及复发后生存(HR 2.25,95% CI .98–5.17,P=.06)均无显著差异。尽管本研究为回顾性数据,但结果支持考虑对挽救治疗后达到CR/PR的R-MYC LBCL患者采用auto-HCT,尤其是在CAR-T 可及性受限或缺乏的地区。

展开英文摘要原文

Although recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in relapsed large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) with MYC rearrangement (R-MYC), the data comparing CAR-T to autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (auto-HCT) in such patients who achieve a complete or partial response (CR/PR) after salvage therapies are limited.

We compared the clinical outcomes of patients with R-MYC LBCL (including double and triple hit lymphomas) who underwent CAR-T or auto-HCT after achieving a CR/PR with salvage therapies using the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research registry. Among the 252 patients (auto-HCT = 98, CAR-T = 154), relative to auto-HCT, CAR-T was associated with significantly lower overall survival (OS) (Hazard Ratio [HR] 2. 09, 95% CI 1. 38-3. 15, p < 0. 001) on multivariate analysis. There were no differences in progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1. 21, 95% CI 0. 81-1. 8 p = 0. 36), risk of relapse (HR 1. 1, 95% CI 0. 71-1. 69 p = 0. 68), nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (HR 1. 74, 95% CI 0. 64-4. 7 p = 0.

28) while the post-relapse survival was longer in auto-HCT relative to CAR-T (HR 1. 93, 95% CI 1. 21-3. 06 p = 0. 01). On propensity score matched analysis accounting for differences in characteristics across the two cohorts, we detected no significant differences in OS (HR 1. 72, 95% CI 0. 92-3. 21 p = 0. 09), PFS (HR 1. 04, 95% CI 0. 64-1. 68 p = 0. 88), NRM (HR 1.

22, 95% CI 0. 35-4. 2 p = 0. 76), relapse (HR = 0. 93, 95% CI 0. 54-1. 6 p = 0. 8) and post-relapse survival (HR 2. 25, 95% CI 0. 98-5. 17, p = 0. 06). These data, although retrospective, support consideration for auto-HCT in patients with R-MYC LBCL who achieve a CR/PR after salvage therapies, particularly in regions with no or limited access to CAR-T.

论文信息

作者
Furqan F、Ahn KW、Kaur M、Patel J、Ansell S、Awan FT、Baird J、Bezerra E
单位
BMT &amp; Cellular Therapy Program, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.United States
文献类型
美国 NIH 资助研究
期刊
American journal of hematology2025 Jul
原文标识
PubMed 40231369 · DOI 10.1002/ajh.27687