CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:CAR T-cell therapy response varies by extranodal disease site in large B-cell lymphoma.
CAR T-cell therapy response varies by extranodal disease site in large B-cell lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
结外(EN)部位是否作为对CD19靶向CAR-T 细胞疗法耐受的“大 sanctuary 区”,其在大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)中的作用尚不明确。研究者回顾性分析283例接受商业化CD19 CAR-T 治疗的成人患者,评估958次PET-CT扫描,时间点包括单采前、淋巴细胞清除前、最佳应答时和复发时。CAR-T 治疗前结外受累较常见(76%)。单纯结外病变患者结局与单纯淋巴结病变(ND)患者相似;但同时有结外和淋巴结病变(EN+ND)的患者完全缓解率较低、无进展生存期较短。不同部位结局不一:肺/胸膜/心包及胃肠道/腹膜受累的局部缓解率最低,分别为48%和51%。
值得注意的是,同一部位复发风险在肺/胸膜/心包(风险比[HR] 7.8)及胃肠道/腹膜(HR 5.97)最高。在CAR-T 治疗后复发患者中,从复发时起计算的2年总生存率,有结外复发者显著低于单纯淋巴结复发者:单纯结外复发为23%,结外合并淋巴结复发为25%,而单纯淋巴结复发为64%(P=.008)。这些发现强调结外病变在CAR-T 受者中十分常见,且不同部位对结局的影响各异,提示需采用器官靶向策略提高疗效。由于事件数不足,无法评估中枢神经系统/眼眶/颅窦、肾上腺/泌尿生殖系统、肝胆/胰腺及脾脏等部位的特异性复发或进展风险。
The role of extranodal (EN) sites as potential sanctuary regions resistant to CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) remains unclear. To investigate this, we retrospectively analyzed 283 adults treated with commercial CD19 CAR-T therapy, assessing 958 PET-CT scans across four time points: pre-apheresis, pre-lymphodepletion, best response, and relapse.
EN involvement prior to CAR-T therapy was common (76%). Outcomes for patients with exclusive EN disease were similar to those with nodal (ND) disease alone; however, patients with concomitant EN and ND disease (EN + ND) had lower complete response rates and shorter progression-free survival. Site-specific outcomes varied: lungs/pleura/pericardium and gastrointestinal/peritoneum involvement had the lowest local response rates (48% and 51%, respectively).
Notably, the risk of same-site relapse was highest in the lungs/pleura/pericardium (hazard ratio [HR] 7. 8) and gastrointestinal/peritoneum (HR 5. 97). Among patients relapsing after CAR-T, two-year overall survival rates from time of relapse were significantly lower in those with EN relapse (23% for exclusive EN; 25% for EN + ND) compared to exclusive ND relapse (64%; p = 0. 008).
These findings underscore the high prevalence of EN disease in CAR-T recipients and its site-specific impact on outcomes, highlighting the need for organ-targeted strategies to enhance treatment efficacy. Differential site-specific response and relapse/progression risk according to pre-CAR-T therapy anatomical site involvement in Large B-cell Lymphoma. Risk of site-specific relapse or progression was not evaluable for CNS/orbital/cranial sinuses, adrenal/genitourinary, hepatobiliary/pancreas, and spleen due to insufficient number of events.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。