CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:The transition between M1 and M2 macrophage phenotypes is associated with the disease status following CD19 CAR-T therapy for B cell lymphoma/leukemia.
The transition between M1 and M2 macrophage phenotypes is associated with the disease status following CD19 CAR-T therapy for B cell lymphoma/leukemia.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
尽管抗CD19嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗复发/难治性B细胞淋巴瘤的缓解率较高,仍有相当比例患者最终出现疾病进展或复发。CAR-T 治疗的短期和长期结局与肿瘤微环境(TME)密切相关,其中不同极化状态的巨噬细胞既可能抑制也可能促进肿瘤。尽管已有证据表明巨噬细胞在CAR-T 治疗淋巴瘤中发挥关键作用,其动态分布和与淋巴瘤进展相关的免疫功能仍不清楚。研究者在免疫健全小鼠中建立同系A20淋巴瘤/白血病模型,并通过免疫组化和流式细胞术检测巨噬细胞分布及极化状态。CD19 CAR-T 治疗显著保护小鼠免受淋巴瘤侵袭,并增加肿瘤组织中的巨噬细胞浸润。
值得注意的是,缓解期以M1样巨噬细胞(CD11b+F4/80+C206−CD80+)为主;复发小鼠则转向M2样表型(CD11b+F4/80+C206+CD80+)。由缓解转为复发伴随M1/M2比值降低及促炎细胞因子减少。定量实时PCR证实缓解与复发小鼠的CD206和CD163表达水平不同;PI3K和STAT3相关信号通路可能促使细胞偏向M2极化。
总之,本研究揭示了淋巴瘤不同进展阶段巨噬细胞极化的动态变化,并强调其对免疫治疗的潜在影响。
Although anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) cells demonstrate high response rates in relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas, a considerable proportion of patients eventually encounter disease progression or relapse. The short-term and long-term outcomes of CAR-T treatment are intricately linked to the tumor microenvironment (TME), wherein macrophages with polarized characteristics can exhibit either anti-tumorigenic or pro-tumorigenic roles.
Despite evidence implicating the crucial involvement of macrophages in CAR-T cell-treated lymphoma, their dynamic distribution and immune function related to lymphoma progression remain poorly understood. Immunocompetent mice were utilized to establish syngeneic A20 lymphoma/leukemia models. The distribution and polarization of macrophages were detected using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and flow cytometry techniques.
We observed that CD19 CAR-T therapy exhibited significant efficacy in protecting mice against lymphoma, leading to increased infiltration of macrophages into the tumor tissue.
Notably, during remission stages, M1-like macrophages (CD11b + F4/80 + C206 - CD80 + ) were predominant, whereas in relapsed mice, there was a shift towards M2-like phenotypes (CD11b + F4/80 + C206 + CD80 + ). The transition from remissive to relapsed status was accompanied by a reduction in the M1/M2 ratio and a decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Furthermore, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis confirmed differential expression levels of CD206 and CD163 between remissive and relapsed mice, while signaling pathways involving PI3K and STAT3 may contribute to the skewing towards M2 polarization. In summary, our findings highlight the dynamic transformation of macrophage polarization during different stages of lymphoma progression and underscore its potential implications for immunotherapeutic interventions.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。