← 返回

培门冬酶联合同步放疗与 P-GEMOX 联合序贯放疗在早期 NK/T 细胞淋巴瘤中的比较

英文原题:Comparison of pegaspargase with concurrent radiation vs. P-GEMOX with sequential radiation in early-stage NK/T-cell lymphoma.

查看英文原题

Comparison of pegaspargase with concurrent radiation vs. P-GEMOX with sequential radiation in early-stage NK/T-cell lymphoma.

PubMed 2025/03/19(内容时间) Oncol Res Q2 · IF 4.6(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

P+CCRT 在早期 NKTCL 中的临床结局与 P-GEMOX + SERT 相当,不良事件也相当。此外,P+CCRT 具有治疗方案更简化、周期更短的优点。鉴于这些令人鼓舞的结果,需要进一步开展队列研究来验证这些结果。

研究思路结论见上方概要

早期自然杀伤/T细胞淋巴瘤(NKTCL)的最佳治疗策略仍不明确。本研究旨在评估和比较两种早期NKTCL治疗方案相关的临床结局和不良事件(AEs):培门冬酶联合同步放疗(P+CCRT)与培门冬酶、吉西他滨和奥沙利铂(P-GEMOX)联合序贯放疗(SERT)。采用倾向性评分匹配(PSM)以确保这些方案之间的均衡比较。

我们评估了来自一项II期试验的P+CCRT的疗效,以及基于真实世界数据的P-GEMOX联合SERT的疗效。采用1:1比例、卡钳值为0.18的PSM来平衡治疗组之间的基线特征。分析的关键结局包括总缓解率(ORR)、完全缓解率(CR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和不良事件(AEs)。

经过PSM后,研究纳入52例患者,每组26例。两组队列的基线特征均衡。P+CCRT组的ORR为100.0%,而P-GEMOX+SERT组为88.5%,CR率分别为100.0%和76.9%。P+CCRT组的3年OS和PFS率均为92.3%,而P-GEMOX组为92.3%的OS和80.8%的PFS。两种方案的不良事件,包括血液学毒性、肝毒性和凝血功能障碍,相当。

展开英文摘要原文

The optimal treatment strategy for early-stage natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes and adverse events (AEs) associated with two treatment regimens for early-stage NKTCL: pegaspargase with concurrent radiation therapy (P+CCRT) and pegaspargase, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin (P-GEMOX) with sequential radiation therapy (SERT). Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to ensure balanced comparison between these regimens.

We assessed the efficacy of P+CCRT from a phase II trial and P-GEMOX combined with SERT using real-world data. PSM was conducted at a 1:1 ratio with a caliper of 0.18 to align baseline characteristics between the treatment groups. Key outcomes analyzed included overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and AEs.

Following PSM, the study included 52 patients, with 26 in each treatment group. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the cohorts. The ORR for P+CCRT group was 100.0% compared to 88.5% for P-GEMOX+ SERT group, and the CR rates was 100.0% vs . 76.9%, respectively. The 3-year OS and PFS rates were both 92.3% for P+CCRT, while P-GEMOX showed 92.3% OS and 80.8% PFS. Adverse events, including hematological toxicity, hepatotoxicity, and coagulation dysfunction, were comparable between the two regimens.

P+CCRT is associated with comparable clinical outcomes compared to P-GEMOX + SERT in early-stage NKTCL, with comparable adverse events. Additionally, P+CCRT offers the benefit of a more streamlined treatment regimen with a shorter cycle. Given these encouraging results, further cohort studies are needed to validate these results.

论文信息

作者
Feng D、Bai S、Chen G、Fu B、Song C、Tang H、Wang L、Wang H
单位
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.China
文献类型
对照研究
期刊
Oncology research2025
原文标识
PubMed 40191721 · DOI 10.32604/or.2024.057065