CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Characteristics of second primary malignancies following bispecific antibodies therapy.
Characteristics of second primary malignancies following bispecific antibodies therapy.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
我们的研究首次对 BsAb 治疗后的 SPM 进行了详细表征,凸显出需要持续开展药物警戒和个体化风险管理,以降低接受 BsAb 治疗患者的 SPM 风险。
与嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞疗法相比,双特异性抗体(BsAb)是一种有前景的替代疗法,但其相关继发原发恶性肿瘤(SPM)风险尚未得到充分研究。
利用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统的大规模真实世界数据,研究者确定 BsAb 治疗后的 SPM 相对频率和特征,并全面比较 BsAb 与 CAR-T 治疗相关的 SPM 图谱。
在 10,280 名接受 BsAb 治疗的患者中识别出 108 例 SPM。过去 8 年 SPM 风险保持稳定,占所有不良事件的 1%–2%;SPM 病例病死率为 29.63%。与接受其他 BsAb 的患者相比,接受 blinatumomab 者髓系白血病和非霍奇金淋巴瘤更常见,而接受 teclistamab 者以实体瘤为主。与未接受 BsAb 者相比,接受 BsAb 患者的起病时间(TTO)显著缩短;体重和治疗持续时间会影响 TTO,而不同 BsAb 产品、年龄和性别之间未发现 TTO 显著差异。研究结果凸显 BsAb 治疗后第一年是早期发现和干预的关键窗口。尽管 BsAb 相关 SPM 总体风险低于 CAR-T,但两组 SPM 结局相近;两种疗法的 TTO 和 SPM 模式在统计学上相似。
本研究首次详细描述 BsAb 后 SPM,凸显持续药物警戒和个体化风险管理的必要性,以降低接受 BsAb 患者的 SPM 风险。
The risk of secondary primary malignancies (SPMs) associated with bispecific antibody (BsAb)-a promising alternative to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T therapy-remains insufficiently explored.
Using large-scale, real-world data from the US Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System, we identified the relative frequency and characteristics of SPMs following BsAbs therapy and conducted a comprehensive comparison of treatment-related SPM profiles between BsAbs and CAR-T therapies.
We identified 108 cases among 10,280 BsAb-treated patients. The incidence risk of SPMs was stable over the past 8 years, accounting for 1-2% of all adverse events, with a case fatality rate of 29.63% among the SPM cases. Myeloid leukemias and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were more frequent in blinatumomab recipients, while solid malignancies predominated in those treated with teclistamab. Time-to-onset (TTO) was significantly shorter in BsAb recipients compared with non-recipients, with weight and treatment duration influencing TTO, while no significant differences in TTO were observed across different BsAb products, ages, and genders. Our findings highlight the first year of BsAbs as a critical window for early detection and intervention. Although the overall risk of SPMs was lower with BsAbs than with CAR-T, the outcomes of SPMs were comparable in both groups. TTO and SPM patterns were statistically similar between the two therapies.
Our study provides the first detailed characterization of SPMs post-BsAb, underscoring the need for continued pharmacovigilance and individualized risk management to mitigate SPM risks in patients undergoing BsAb therapy.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。