CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:5-5-5 ABRT (Dose of 5 Gy per Fraction for up to 5 Fractions Over 5 Weeks Adaptive Bridging Radiation Therapy)-Artificial Intelligence Enters the CAR (-T) (Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T) in Relapsed/Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma.
5-5-5 ABRT (Dose of 5 Gy per Fraction for up to 5 Fractions Over 5 Weeks Adaptive Bridging Radiation Therapy)-Artificial Intelligence Enters the CAR (-T) (Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T) in Relapsed/Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
我们证明了在这高度复发/难治人群中,ABRT 以每分次 5 Gy、5 周内最多 5 分次的剂量是安全可行的,即使在疾病负荷高的患者中也是如此,绝大多数患者对 1 至 2 次 5 Gy 分次治疗有反应。
桥接放疗(BRT)可有效控制接受嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞治疗的复发/难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的局部病灶。研究者假设,适应性桥接放疗(ABRT)可根据实时淋巴瘤靶体积个体化调整放射剂量、分割方案和照射范围,且对局部控制可行、安全、有效。方法与材料:开展试点研究,对转诊接受 BRT 的患者每周进行一次基于 CT 的适应性放疗(Varian Ethos);每次 5 Gy,最多 5 次,疗程最长 5 周(NCT06004167)。
共纳入 10 例患者。为姑息目的照射 11 个部位,整体症状缓解率为 100%。总计 40 次 ABRT 计划中完成 26 次分次照射(65%)。11 个靶体积中有 8 个在前 1 或 2 次照射后暂停 ABRT。CAR-T 前 ABRT 期间照射野内应答为完全缓解(n = 3,30%)、部分缓解(n = 6,60%)和照射野内进展(n = 1,10%)。CAR-T 输注后,最佳总体缓解率为 70%(n = 7),且均达到完全缓解。10 例患者中有 3 例自 BRT 开始后出现照射野内复发。发生免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征的患者有 6 例,其中 3 级者占 50%(n = 3)。未报告 3 级或以上细胞因子释放综合征。末次随访时 9 例患者(90%)仍存活,1 例(10%)死于疾病进展。
在这一高度复发/难治人群(包括肿瘤负荷高者)中,每次 5 Gy、最多 5 次、疗程最长 5 周的 ABRT 安全可行;绝大多数患者接受 1–2 次 5 Gy 照射后已有应答。所有患者症状均得到缓解,且都能继续接受 CAR-T 细胞输注。
Bridging radiation therapy (BRT) is effective for local control in patients with relapsed or refractory large B cell lymphoma who are undergoing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. We hypothesized that adaptive BRT (ABRT), which can be used to personalize the radiation dose, fractionation, and volume based on real-time lymphoma target volume, is feasible, safe, and effective for local control. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a pilot study to investigate, once weekly, computed tomography-based adaptive radiation therapy (Varian Ethos) at a dose of 5 Gy per fraction for up to 5 fractions over 5 weeks in patients referred for BRT (NCT06004167).
Ten patients were enrolled. Eleven sites were irradiated for palliative purposes, achieving an overall symptomatic response rate of 100%. Of the 40 total ABRT sessions, 26 fractions were delivered (65%). For 8 of the 11 target volumes treated, ABRT was held after the first 1 or 2 fractions. The in-field responses during ABRT pre-CAR T were: complete response (n = 3, 30%), partial response (n = 6, 60%), and in-field progression (n = 1, 10%). After CAR T cell infusion, the best overall response rate was 70% (n = 7), all of whom achieved complete response. Among all 10 patients, 3 experienced in-field recurrence after start date of BRT. Among those with immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (n = 6), grade 3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 50% (n = 3). No grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome events were reported. At the time of the last follow-up, 9 patients (90%) were still alive, and 1 patient (10%) died due to disease progression.
We demonstrate the safety and feasibility of ABRT at a dose of 5 Gy per fraction for up to 5 fractions over 5 weeks in this highly relapsed/refractory population, even in patients with high-volume disease, with the vast majority responding to 1 to 2 fractions of 5 Gy. All patients achieved symptomatic relief and were able to proceed to CAR T cell infusion.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。