← 返回

在美国,引入 glofitamab 用于治疗经过两线或以上全身治疗后复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的预算影响

英文原题:Budget impact of introducing glofitamab for treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy in the United States.

查看英文原题

Budget impact of introducing glofitamab for treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy in the United States.

PubMed 2025/05/02(内容时间) J Med Econ Q1 · IF 3.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

在较新的疗法中,接受治疗患者的 3 年总成本最低,glofitamab 作为 3L+DLBCL 市场中可用的选择,估计可为假设的 1, 000, 000 名成员的健康计划在 3 年内节省累计总成本$728, 697 和 PMPM 成本$0.0202。Glofitamab 是一种用于治疗一种常见类型血癌的新疗法,该血癌对至少两种其他治疗无应答。本分析估计了如果健康计划覆盖并使用 glofitamab 而非 epcoritamab 或其他选择,其在 3 年期间支出的变化,并发现该计划的 3 年支出在总体成本上每计划成员每月减少了$0.02。

研究思路结论见上方概要

Glofitamab是一种T细胞衔接双特异性单克隆抗体,已获得美国食品药品监督管理局的加速批准,用于既往接受过≥2线系统性治疗(3L+)后复发/难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL,非特指型)或滤泡性淋巴瘤转化的大B细胞淋巴瘤成人患者。

为假设的混合商业/Medicare健康计划开发了一个预算影响模型,该计划有1,000,000名成员。对照药物为axicabtagene ciloleucel(Axi-cel)、lisocabtagene maraleucel(Liso-cel)、tisagenlecleucel(Tisa-cel)、loncastuximab tesirine、polatuzumab vedotin + bendamustine + rituximab、rituximab + gemcitabine + oxaliplatin、tafasitamab + lenalidomide和epcoritamab(Epcor)。总费用包括药物、浪费、给药、≥3级不良反应和所有级别细胞因子释放综合征)以及常规护理的费用。市场份额基于内部预测和专家意见。计算了3年内的总预算影响和每成员每月(PMPM)净预算影响。

在一个拥有1,000,000名成员的健康计划中,预计约有九名患者符合3L + DLBCL治疗的条件。引入glofitamab作为治疗选择后,估计在3年内分别节省了总成本$728,697和PMPM成本-$0.0202。所有成本类别均有所降低,尤其是药品成本。在较新的疗法中,每位接受治疗患者的3年总成本以glofitamab最低:$226,658,而Tisa-cel = $564,113;Axi-cel = $540,002;Liso-cel = $516,272;Epcor = $335,293。在所有敏感性分析中,纳入glofitamab对PMPM预算影响极小,范围为-$0.0256至-$0.0108。

展开英文摘要原文

Glofitamab is a T-cell engaging bispecific monoclonal antibody that was granted accelerated approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration for adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), not otherwise specified or large B-cell lymphoma arising from follicular lymphoma, after ≥2 lines of systemic therapy (3L+).

A budget impact model was developed for a hypothetical blended commercial/Medicare health plan with 1,000,000 members. Comparators were axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel), lisocabtagene maraleucel (Liso-cel), tisagenlecleucel (Tisa-cel), loncastuximab tesirine, polatuzumab vedotin + bendamustine + rituximab, rituximab + gemcitabine + oxaliplatin, tafasitamab + lenalidomide, and epcoritamab (Epcor). Total costs included those for drugs, wastage, administration, grade ≥3 adverse reactions, and all-grade cytokine release syndrome) and routine care. Market shares were based on internal projections and expert opinions. Total and per-member per-month (PMPM) net budget impacts over 3 years were calculated.

Approximately nine patients were projected to be eligible for 3L + DLBCL treatment in a health plan of 1,000,000 members. The introduction of glofitamab as a treatment option resulted in estimated total and PMPM cost savings of $728,697 and -$0.0202, respectively, over 3 years. Costs were reduced across all cost categories but particularly in drug costs. Among the newer therapies, total 3-year cost per treated patient was lowest for glofitamab: $226,658 versus Tisa-cel = $564,113; Axi-cel = $540,002; Liso-cel = $516,272; and Epcor = $335,293. Across all sensitivity analyses, the inclusion of glofitamab had minimal PMPM budget impact, ranging from -$0.0256 to -$0.0108.

With the lowest 3-year total cost per treated patient among the newer therapies, glofitamab being an available option in the 3L + DLBCL market is estimated to save a hypothetical 1,000,000-member health plan $728,697 in cumulative total costs and $0.0202 in PMPM costs over 3 years. Glofitamab is a new treatment for a common type of blood cancer that does not respond to at least two other treatments. This analysis estimated the change in a health plan’s spending over a 3-year period if it covered and used glofitamab rather than epcoritamab or other options and found that the plan’s 3-year spending decreased by $0.02 per plan member per month in overall costs.

论文信息

作者
Mahmoudjafari Z、Li J、Bercaw E、Parisé H、Bognar K、Wang ST、Masaquel A
第一作者单位
The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, USA.United States
通讯作者单位
Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.United States
期刊
Journal of medical economics2025 Dec
原文标识
PubMed 40163049 · DOI 10.1080/13696998.2025.2486839