← 返回

苯达莫司汀对比氟达拉滨/环磷酰胺用于淋巴瘤 CAR-T 细胞治疗前淋巴细胞清除的疗效比较

英文原题:Comparative Efficacy of Bendamustine Versus Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide for Lymphodepletion Before Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Lymphoma.

查看英文原题

Comparative Efficacy of Bendamustine Versus Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide for Lymphodepletion Before Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Lymphoma.

PubMed 2025/03/22(内容时间) Transplant Cell Ther Q1 · IF 4.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

在复发/难治性 NHL 中,苯达莫司汀可作为 CAR-T 治疗前 LDC 中 Flu/Cy 的可行替代方案,其疗效与安全性相当。

中文摘要

CAR-T 细胞疗法是复发/难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)治疗的重要突破。有效的输注前淋巴清除化疗(LDC)对于优化 CAR-T 结局至关重要。传统上采用氟达拉滨联合环磷酰胺(Flu/Cy),但全球氟达拉滨短缺促使人们寻找替代方案。本研究比较苯达莫司汀与 Flu/Cy 作为 NHL 患者 LDC 的疗效和安全性。

比较接受 CAR-T 治疗的复发/难治性 NHL 患者使用苯达莫司汀或 Flu/Cy 作为 LDC 的疗效和安全性。研究者假设苯达莫司汀可获得与 Flu/Cy 相当的结局,同时具有门诊应用的流程优势。研究设计:回顾性分析 2018 年 1 月至 2023 年 10 月接受 FDA 批准 CAR-T 产品治疗的 265 例 NHL 患者。结局包括 CRS、ICANS、血液学恢复、PFS、OS 及医疗资源使用情况。采用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析和多变量 Cox 比例风险模型,校正 CAR-T 产品类型、输注年份、疾病亚型及地塞米松预防用药。

两种 LDC 方案均能有效为 CAR-T 治疗做好准备,CRS、ICANS、OS 和 PFS 均无显著差异。1 年时,苯达莫司汀组与 Flu/Cy 组 OS 分别为 71% 和 68%,PFS 分别为 68% 和 60%(P 分别为 0.3 和 0.4)。苯达莫司汀相关严重血液学毒性较少;71% 的苯达莫司汀患者 ANC 未降至 0.5 K/μL 以下,而 Flu/Cy 组为 17%(P < 0.001)。多变量分析显示,输注年份是 OS(HR 0.77,P = 0.008)和 PFS(HR 2.6,P < 0.001)的显著预测因子,反映 CAR-T 实践随时间改善。

苯达莫司汀是 CAR-T 治疗前 LDC 的可行替代方案,其在复发/难治性 NHL 中的疗效和安全性与 Flu/Cy 相当。其操作优势包括减少住院并适合门诊给药,因此可能适用于多种临床环境。仍需前瞻性研究确认长期结局,并进一步优化 LDC 策略。

展开英文摘要原文

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy represents a transformative advance in treating relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). Effective pre-infusion lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC) is essential for optimizing CAR-T outcomes. Traditionally, a combination of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (Flu/Cy) has been used; however, a global fludarabine shortage warranted a search for alternative regimens. This study compares the efficacy and safety of bendamustine versus Flu/Cy as LDC in NHL patients.

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of bendamustine versus Flu/Cy as LDC regimens in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL undergoing CAR-T therapy. We hypothesized that bendamustine would offer comparable outcomes to Flu/Cy while providing logistical advantages in outpatient settings. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective analysis evaluated 265 NHL patients treated with FDA-approved CAR-T products from January 2018 to October 2023. Outcomes included cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), hematologic recovery, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and healthcare resource utilization. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were employed to adjust for CAR-T product type, infusion year, disease subtype, and dexamethasone prophylaxis.

Both LDC regimens effectively prepared patients for CAR-T therapy, with no significant differences in CRS, ICANS, OS, or PFS. At one year, OS was 71% for bendamustine versus 68% for Flu/Cy, and PFS was 68% versus 60% (P = .3 and P = .4, respectively). Bendamustine was associated with less severe hematologic toxicity; ANC levels did not fall below 0.5 K/ L in 71% of bendamustine recipients compared to 17% for Flu/Cy (P < .001). Multivariable analysis identified infusion year as a significant predictor of OS (HR 0.77, P = .008) and PFS (HR 2.6, P < .001), reflecting improvements in CAR-T practices over time.

Bendamustine is a viable alternative to Flu/Cy for LDC prior to CAR-T therapy in relapsed/refractory NHL, as it demonstrates comparable efficacy and safety. Its operational advantages, including reduced hospitalization rates and suitability for outpatient administration, underscore its potential in diverse clinical settings. Prospective studies are needed to confirm long-term outcomes and further optimize LDC strategies.

论文信息

作者
Rao UK、Majhail NS、Blunk B、Abernathy K、Bachier C、Bhushan V、Cruz JC、Elayan M
单位
Sarah Cannon Transplant and Cellular Therapy Network, St. David's South Austin Medical Center, Austin, Texas. Electronic address: uttam.rao@hcahealthcare.com.
文献类型
对照研究
期刊
Transplantation and cellular therapy2025 Aug
原文标识
PubMed 40122282 · DOI 10.1016/j.jtct.2025.03.012