← 返回

SOHO 前沿进展与待解问题:边缘区淋巴瘤的治疗选择

英文原题:SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Treatment Options for Marginal Zone Lymphoma.

查看英文原题

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Treatment Options for Marginal Zone Lymphoma.

PubMed 2025/02/11(内容时间) Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk Q1 · IF 4.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

目前的分类确定了3种主要的边缘区淋巴瘤(MZL)类型:结外MZL、脾MZL和结内MZL。MZL通常具有极好的长期预后,且往往不需要立即治疗。对于无症状患者,主动监测(观察等待)是标准方法。

然而,也存在例外情况。无症状的幽门螺杆菌阳性胃MZL患者应在确诊时接受抗生素根除治疗。同样,感染丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的无症状患者应接受抗病毒治疗。手术切除通常不是适应证。受累部位放疗(ISRT)推荐用于局限期疾病(20-24Gy,取决于解剖部位)。虽然根治性治疗通常需要更高剂量,但当根治性治愈不是目标时,极低剂量ISRT(2 2 Gy)可以实现长期控制,并在毒性极低的情况下提供有效的姑息治疗。晚期疾病的有症状患者可能从以利妥昔单抗为基础的系统性治疗中获益。利妥昔单抗单药治疗适用于不能耐受化疗或优先选择低毒性初始方案的患者。利妥昔单抗联合苯达莫司汀或苯丁酸氮芥可以延长缓解持续时间和无进展生存期,但不能改善总生存期,对于晚期疾病中症状严重的患者可能更为优选。含多柔比星的更强效方案毒性更大,应保留用于组织学转化、侵袭性表现或大包块的患者。尽管临床试验数据有限,但几种新疗法已显示出令人鼓舞的结果,包括双特异性抗体、嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T细胞疗法和小分子药物。治疗选择取决于MZL亚型、分期、年龄、合并症和治疗目标。

展开英文摘要原文

Current classifications identify 3 primary types of marginal zone lymphoma (MZL): extra nodal, splenic, and nodal MZL. MZLs typically have excellent long-term outcomes and often do not require immediate treatment. For asymptomatic patients, active surveillance (watch-and-wait) is the standard approach.

However, exceptions exist. Asymptomatic patients with Helicobacter pylori-positive gastric MZL should receive antibiotic eradication therapy upon diagnosis. Similarly, asymptomatic patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) should receive antiviral therapy. Surgical resection is generally not indicated. Involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) is recommended for localized disease (20-24Gy, depending on the anatomical site). While higher doses are often needed for curative intent, very low-dose ISRT (2 2 Gy) can achieve long-term control and provide effective palliation with minimal toxicity when a definitive cure is not the goal. Symptomatic patients with advanced-stage disease may benefit from systemic rituximab-based treatment.

Rituximab monotherapy is suitable for patients who cannot tolerate chemotherapy or prioritize a low-toxicity initial approach. The combination of rituximab with bendamustine or chlorambucil can result in longer response duration and progression-free survival, but not in improved overall survival, and may be preferred for severely symptomatic patients with advanced disease.

More intensive doxorubicin-containing regimens, which are more toxic, should be reserved for patients with histological transformation, aggressive presentations, or bulky masses. Although data from clinical trials are limited, several new therapies have shown encouraging results, including bispecific antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy, and small molecules. Treatment choices depend on the MZL subtype, stage, age, comorbidities, and therapeutic goals.

论文信息

作者
Pirosa MC、Stathis A、Rossi D、Zucca E
第一作者单位
Clinic of Hematology, EOC, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Institute of Oncology Research, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.Switzerland
通讯作者单位
Clinic of Hematology, EOC, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Institute of Oncology Research, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland. Electronic address: emanuele.zucca@eoc.ch.Switzerland
文献类型
综述
期刊
Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2025 Jul
原文标识
PubMed 40055115 · DOI 10.1016/j.clml.2025.02.002

READING GUIDES

相关资料阅读指南

了解这条资料涉及的技术、疾病或试验登记信息,再回到原始来源核实。