← 返回前沿论文

实体瘤中 TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)治疗的结局——一项系统综述与荟萃分析

英文原题:Outcomes of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy in solid tumours - A systematic review and meta analysis.

PubMed 2025/02/18(内容时间) Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Q1 · IF 6.2(JCR 2025)

研究概要

根据研究结果,TIL 疗法在治疗实体瘤,尤其是黑色素瘤方面有效,但其结果因癌症类型和肿瘤微环境而异。因此,需要更多研究来确定最佳治疗方案。

研究思路结论见上方概要

TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)治疗是一种个体化方法,利用机体免疫系统靶向并摧毁癌细胞,用于治疗不同类型的实体瘤。尽管其有效性已在某些疾病中得到证实,如卵巢癌和黑色素瘤,但研究仍在进行中,以探究其是否对更广泛的实体瘤也有益处。

系统评估TIL疗法对多种实体瘤的安全性、有效性及临床结果。

通过对多个数据库的全面检索,共获得218篇关于TIL治疗各种实体瘤的论文(2018-2024年)。符合定量分析纳入要求的10篇论文中有9篇也被纳入了系统评价。两名评价员分别提取数据并进行评价。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估研究质量,并采用meta分析中的I2统计量衡量异质性。

多项研究探讨了TIL治疗在不同类型癌症中的有效性,结果各异。在NSCLC和黑色素瘤中,较高的CD8+/CD4+ TIL比值与改善的结局相关;在晚期黑色素瘤中,TIL治疗优于ipilimumab。缓解率存在差异,NSCLC为23.1%,黑色素瘤高达53.3%。大多数研究质量良好,并经Newcastle-Ottawa量表确认,但部分研究在随访方面存在问题。结果的可靠性经ROBINS-I和ROB2工具确认,显示偏倚风险为低至中等。

展开英文摘要原文

BACKGROUND: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) treatment is an individualized method of treating different types of solid tumors by using the immune system of the body to target and destroy cancer cells. Although its usefulness has been shown in certain diseases, such as ovarian cancer and melanoma, research is still being done to see whether it is also beneficial against a wider variety of solid tumors. AIM: To methodically assess the safety, effectiveness, and clinical results of TIL therapy for various solid tumors. METHODOLOGY: A thorough search in various databases produced 218 papers on TIL treatment for various solid tumors (2018-2024). Nine of the ten papers that satisfied the requirements for inclusion in the quantitative analysis were also included in the systematic review. Two reviewers separately extracted the data and evaluated it. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool were used to evaluate the quality of the studies, and the I2 statistic in the meta-analysis was used to measure heterogeneity. RESULTS: Numerous studies that looked at the effectiveness of TIL treatment in different types of cancer showed different results. In NSCLC and melanoma, higher CD8+/CD4+ TIL ratios were associated with improved outcomes; in advanced melanoma, TIL therapy was superior to ipilimumab. Response rates differed, with NSCLC showing up at 23.1 % and melanoma up to 53.3 %. Most studies were of good quality and is confirmed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, while some had problems with follow-up. The results' dependability was confirmed by the ROBINS-I and ROB2 tools, which showed low to moderate bias risk. CONCLUSION: According to the study's findings, TIL therapy is effective in treating solid tumors, especially melanoma, but its results vary according to the kind of cancer as well as tumour microenvironments. Therefore more research is needed to determine the best course of action.

论文信息

作者
Mony U、Veeraraghavan VP
单位
Centre of Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics (COMManD), Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, India; School of Allied and Public Health Sciences and Technology, Malla Reddy Vishwavidyapeeth, Suraram, Hyderabad 500055, India. Electronic address: ullasmony@gmail.com.India
文献类型
系统综述 · 荟萃分析
期刊
Critical reviews in oncology/hematology2025 May
原文标识
PubMed 39978425 · DOI 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104671