← 返回

嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T 细胞疗法治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的疗效与安全性:系统综述与荟萃分析

英文原题:Efficacy and Safety of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T Cell Therapy in Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

查看英文原题

Efficacy and Safety of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T Cell Therapy in Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PubMed 2025/02/10(内容时间) Am J Clin Oncol Q4 · IF 1.8(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

CAR-TCT 显著改善难治性 NHL 的 OS 和 PFS,但对 EFS 无明显影响。虽然其 ORR 与标准化疗相当,但 CAR-TCT 具有更好的安全性,使其成为一种有前景的治疗选择。

研究思路结论见上方概要

非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)是一组异质性淋巴增殖性恶性肿瘤,通常比霍奇金淋巴瘤更难以预测,结外播散的可能性更高。NHL对标准化疗的耐药性不断增加,导致对CAR-T 细胞疗法(CAR-TCT)等个体化治疗的关注日益增长。

通过PubMed、ScienceDirect、Google Scholar和Cochrane Library对截至2024年7月发表的关于CAR-TCT治疗NHL的研究进行了文献检索。评估的结局包括总生存期(OS)、无事件生存期(EFS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和不良事件(AEs)。使用RevMan 5.41和Comprehensive Meta-analysis 3对数据进行合并。

在532篇文章中,有8篇符合纳入标准。与标准化疗相比,CAR-TCT显著改善了OS(HR:0.79;95% CI:0.63-1.00;P=0.05)和PFS(HR:0.46;95% CI:0.36-0.58;P<0.00001)。然而,EFS无显著差异(HR:0.54;95% CI:0.26-1.09;P=0.09)。约76.6%的NHL患者对CAR-TCT有应答,但CAR-TCT与标准治疗之间的ORR相似(MD:19.23%;95% CI:-11.34%至49.80%;P=0.22)。安全性分析发现,CAR-TCT与标准治疗的3级AEs发生率相当。然而,CAR-TCT与更高的中性粒细胞减少风险相关,但血小板减少、贫血和恶心风险更低。

展开英文摘要原文

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) are a diverse group of lymphoproliferative malignancies, often more unpredictable than Hodgkin lymphomas, with a higher likelihood of extranodal spread. NHL's resistance to standard chemotherapy has increased, leading to a growing interest in personalized treatments like chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies (CAR-TCT).

A literature search was conducted across PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library for studies on CAR-TCT in NHL treatment published until July 2024. The outcomes assessed included overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). Data were pooled using RevMan 5.41 and Comprehensive Meta-analysis 3.

Out of 532 articles, 8 met the inclusion criteria. CAR-TCT significantly improved OS (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.63-1.00; P =0.05) and PFS (HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.36-0.58; P <0.00001) compared with standard chemotherapy. However, EFS was not significantly different (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.26-1.09; P =0.09). About 76.6% of NHL patients responded to CAR-TCT, but the ORR was similar between CAR-TCT and standard therapy (MD: 19.23%; 95% CI: -11.34% to 49.80%; P =0.22). Safety analysis found a grade 3 AEs incidence comparable to CAR-TCT and standard care. However, CAR-TCT was associated with higher neutropenia risk but lower thrombocytopenia, anemia, and nausea risks.

CAR-TCT significantly improves OS and PFS in refractory NHL but does not notably impact EFS. While its ORR is comparable to standard chemotherapy, CAR-TCT has a better safety profile, making it a promising treatment option.

论文信息

作者
Jamil A、Qureshi Z、Siddique R、Altaf F、Akram H、Jamil R、Aslam S、Selene II
第一作者单位
Department of Medicine, Samaritan Medical Centre Watertown.
通讯作者单位
University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
文献类型
荟萃分析 · 系统综述
期刊
American journal of clinical oncology2025 May 1
原文标识
PubMed 39924687 · DOI 10.1097/COC.0000000000001171