CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Exclusion of People Living with HIV in Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Studies: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Clinical Trials from 2014 to 2024.
Exclusion of People Living with HIV in Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Studies: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Clinical Trials from 2014 to 2024.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
可能部分由于 ASCO、NCI 和 NCCN 的倡导,美国基于 NHL 临床试验中对 PLWH 的排除显著减少。未来研究应分析免疫疗法在 PLWH 中的安全性和有效性,以促进包容并减少医生和研究人员的污名化。
人类免疫缺陷病毒与多种侵袭性非霍奇金B细胞淋巴瘤(NHL)的发生相关。尽管如此,HIV感染者(PLWH)常被排除在临床试验之外。本文分析了自2017年以来,在多方面倡导努力下,PLWH临床试验排除情况的变化。
我们使用公开的NIH临床试验数据库(https://www.ClinicalTrials.gov/),识别了所有以“lymphoma”为关键词、开始日期在2014年1月1日至2025年1月4日之间的美国本土临床试验。纳入所有侵袭性B细胞NHL亚型的研究。采用回归模型分析描述性因素。
共纳入1,973项美国临床试验,其中945项符合进一步分析标准。PLWH被排除的比例为2018年前59% vs 2018年后48%。多因素调整后,NIH资助的试验(排除率24%,p < 0.001)、其他资助方(排除率64%)以及2018年后启动的研究(排除率48%,p < 0.001)与纳入相关,而CAR-T 相关研究(排除率62%,p < 0.05)与排除相关。
Human immunodeficiency virus is associated with the development of various aggressive non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphomas (NHL). Despite this, people living with HIV (PLWH) are often excluded from clinical trials. Here we analyze the change in clinical trial exclusion among PLWH resulting from multilateral advocacy efforts since 2017.
We identified all US-based clinical trials with the keyword "lymphoma" with start dates between January 01, 2014 and January 04, 2025 using the publicly available NIH Clinical Trial Database (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/). All studies with aggressive B-cell NHL subtypes were included. Regression models were performed to analyze descriptive factors.
1,973 US-based clinical trials were captured, of which 945 met criteria for further analysis. PLWH were excluded from 59% pre-2018 versus 48% post-2018. After multivariate adjustment, NIH-funded trials (24% exclusion rate, p < 0.001), other funders (64% exclusion rate), and studies initiated post-2018 (48% exclusion rate, p < 0.001) were associated with inclusion, while CAR-T-related studies (62% exclusion rate, p < 0.05) were associated with exclusion.
Likely partly due to advocacy from ASCO, NCI, and NCCN, there was a significant decrease in exclusion among PLWH in US-based NHL clinical trials. Future research should analyze the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy in PLWH to foster inclusion and reduce stigma among physicians and researchers.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。