← 返回

按诊疗机构类型划分的临床试验参与、临床诊疗与患者结局:慢性淋巴细胞白血病或套细胞淋巴瘤患者的真实世界数据库分析

英文原题:Clinical trial participation, clinical care, and patient outcomes by practice setting: a real-world database analysis of patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

查看英文原题

Clinical trial participation, clinical care, and patient outcomes by practice setting: a real-world database analysis of patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

PubMed 2025/02/05(内容时间) Hematology Q3 · IF 2(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

在学术机构接受治疗的患者与在社区接受治疗的患者存在差异;在学术机构接受治疗与显著更长的 OS 和更高的试验参与率相关。需要进一步研究,以更好地理解可能促成所观察到结局的因素。

研究思路结论见上方概要

本研究旨在按诊疗机构类型比较小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤/慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)或套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)患者的治疗模式、临床试验参与情况及临床结局。

本研究使用了一个全国性的电子健康记录(EHR)衍生的去标识化数据库。符合条件的患者为2013-2022年间诊断为CLL或MCL并接受了针对其疾病的系统性治疗的患者。使用Kaplan Meier法分析总生存期(OS),对数据库中末次观察时无事件的患者进行删失。采用Cox比例风险回归模型对基线协变量进行调整。

共有6,372例CLL患者和3,411例MCL患者符合本分析的入组标准;其中分别有13.9%和22.2%在学术机构接受治疗。学术机构与更高的患者量相关,并且更倾向于使用CAR-T 治疗MCL、将CLL或MCL患者纳入临床试验,以及诊治更年轻、白种人的患者,并且在CLL中具有更高的del(17p)突变率(所有p < 0.01)。在学术机构与社区机构接受治疗的患者中,生存期显著更长(CLL的中位OS未达到 vs 80.5个月;MCL自一线治疗开始为95.6 vs 68.7个月)。

展开英文摘要原文

This study was designed to compare treatment patterns, clinical trial participation, and clinical outcomes among patients with small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) by site of care.

A nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database was utilized for this study. Eligible patients were diagnosed with either CLL or MCL from 2013-2022 who received systemic therapy for their disease. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan Meier method, censoring patients without events at last observation in the database. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to adjust for baseline covariates.

A total of 6,372 patients with CLL and 3,411 with MCL met eligibility criteria for this analysis; 13.9% and 22.2%, respectively, were treated in academic settings. Academic settings were associated with higher patient volume and were more likely to treat MCL with CAR-T, enroll patients with CLL or MCL to clinical trials, and care for patients who were younger, White, and for CLL with higher rates of del(17p) mutations (all p < 0.01). Survival was significantly longer among patients treated in academic vs community settings (median OS not reached vs 80.5 months for CLL; 95.6 vs 68.7 months for MCL from start of first-line therapy). DISCUSSION: Patients who received care in academic settings differed from those treated in the community; care in academic settings was associated with significantly longer OS and higher trial participation. Further research is warranted to better understand the factors that may contribute to the observed outcomes.

论文信息

作者
Bruno DS、Khanal M、Li X、Escalon MP、Winfree K、Hess LM
第一作者单位
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.United States
通讯作者单位
Lilly Oncology, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.Italy
期刊
Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025 Dec
原文标识
PubMed 39910811 · DOI 10.1080/16078454.2025.2457809