CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Treatment failure patterns in early versus late introduction of CAR T-cell therapy in large B-cell lymphoma.
Treatment failure patterns in early versus late introduction of CAR T-cell therapy in large B-cell lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CD19 靶向CAR-T 细胞疗法近期已被批准作为复发/难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)的二线治疗。本研究比较了接受 CAR-T 作为二线(早期给药)与三线或后续线(晚期给药)治疗患者的疾病复发和进展模式。
我们分析了 354 例接受 Axicabtagene ciloleucel(71%)和 Lisocabtagene maraleucel(29%)治疗的患者;80 例(23%)接受早期给药,274 例(77%)接受晚期给药。早期组 1 年总生存率更高(82% [95% CI 72-93] vs. 71% [95% CI 66-77],p = 0.048)。
然而,在多变量 Cox 回归建模和倾向评分匹配中,生存获益未能持续。1 年累积复发发生率相似(37% [95% CI 24-50] vs. 43% [95% CI 37-49],p = 0.2),1 年无进展生存期概率也相似(62% [95% CI 50-76] vs. 50% [95% CI 44-57],p = 0.14)。早期组表现出有利的毒性特征,2 级细胞因子释放综合征发生率更低(26% vs. 39%,p = 0.031),重度中性粒细胞减少的累积发生率降低(41% [95% CI 30-52] vs. 55% [95% CI 49-60],p = 0.027)。
我们的结果表明,无论治疗线数如何,CAR-T 均可获得有利结局。疾病控制方面的等效性提示,在一线治疗失败的 LBCL 中,CAR-T 耐药机制持续存在。
CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has recently been approved as second-line treatment for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL).
This study compares patterns of disease relapse and progression across patients receiving CAR-T as second-line (early administration) versus third or subsequent lines (late administration).
We analyzed 354 patients treated with Axicabtagene ciloleucel (71%) and Lisocabtagene maraleucel (29%); 80 (23%) received early administration, and 274 (77%) late administration. One-year overall survival was higher in the early group (82% [95% CI 72-93] vs. 71% [95% CI 66-77], p = 0. 048).
However, the survival benefit was not sustained in multivariable Cox regression modeling and propensity score matching. One-year cumulative incidences of relapse were similar (37% [95% CI 24-50] vs. 43% [95% CI 37-49], p = 0. 2), as were 1-year progression-free survival probabilities (62% [95% CI 50-76] vs.
50% [95% CI 44-57], p = 0. 14). The early group exhibited a favorable toxicity profile, with lower rate of grade 2 cytokine release syndrome (26% vs. 39%, p = 0. 031) and reduced cumulative incidence of severe neutropenia (41% [95% CI 30-52] vs. 55% [95% CI 49-60], p = 0. 027).
Our results indicate favorable outcomes with CAR-T irrespective of treatment line. The equivalence in disease control suggests that CAR-T resistance mechanisms persist in LBCL failing first-line therapy.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。