← 返回

接受 axicabtagene ciloleucel 治疗的 R/R LBCL 患者中静脉到静脉时间的影响

英文原题:Impact of vein-to-vein time in patients with R/R LBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel.

查看英文原题

Impact of vein-to-vein time in patients with R/R LBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel.

PubMed 2025/06/10(内容时间) Blood Adv Q1 · IF 7.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞产品axicabtagene ciloleucel(axi-cel)、tisagenlecleucel(tisa-cel)和lisocabtagene maraleucel(liso-cel)已获批用于复发/难治性(R/R)大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)。新出现的证据表明,延迟的CAR-T 细胞输注,包括从白细胞分离术到输注的时间延长,即静脉到静脉时间(V2Vt),可能对临床结局产生不利影响。

我们进行了一项系统文献综述(SLR)和meta分析,以确定接受axi-cel、tisa-cel或liso-cel治疗的R/R LBCL患者中V2Vt的差异。在一项使用国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心数据的上市后安全性研究中,评估了V2Vt(<28天 vs 28至<40天 vs 40天)对接受axi-cel治疗患者有效性和安全性结局的影响。SLR和meta分析显示,与tisa-cel(48.4天)或liso-cel(35.9天)相比,接受axi-cel治疗的患者中位V2Vt最短(30.6天)。对接受axi-cel治疗患者的真实世界分析表明,V2Vt 40天与完全缓解率显著低于V2Vt <28天(比值比[OR],0.61)或28至<40天(OR,0.66)相关,且总生存期显著差于V2Vt <28天(风险比[HR],1.33)或28至<40天(HR,1.36)。与<28天相比,axi-cel V2Vt 28至<40天或40天的患者中观察到更高的持续性血小板减少率(OR分别为1.44或1.95)。

总之,这些结果显示了V2Vt对axi-cel治疗患者结局的影响,并且更早输注CD19-CAR治疗可能有益。

展开英文摘要原文

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell products axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) are approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Emerging evidence indicates that delayed CAR T-cell infusion, including prolonged time from leukapheresis to infusion, known as vein-to-vein time (V2Vt), may adversely impact clinical outcomes.

We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis to identify differences in V2Vt in patients with R/R LBCL treated with axi-cel, tisa-cel, or liso-cel. The impact of V2Vt (<28 days vs 28 to <40 days vs 40 days) on effectiveness and safety outcomes was evaluated in patients treated with axi-cel enrolled in a post-authorization safety study using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research data. SLR and meta-analysis showed that patients treated with axi-cel had the shortest median V2Vt (30. 6 days) compared with tisa-cel (48.

4 days) or liso-cel (35. 9 days). Real-world analysis of patients treated with axi-cel demonstrated that V2Vt 40 days was associated with significantly lower complete response rate than V2Vt <28 days (odds ratio [OR], 0. 61) or 28 to <40 days (OR, 0. 66) and significantly worse overall survival than V2Vt <28 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1. 33) or 28 to <40 days (HR, 1. 36). Higher prolonged thrombocytopenia rates were observed in patients with axi-cel V2Vt 28 to <40 days or 40 days compared with <28 days (OR, 1. 44 or 1. 95, respectively).

Together, these results show the impact of V2Vt on patient outcomes with axi-cel therapy and that earlier infusion with CD19-CAR therapies may be beneficial.

论文信息

作者
Locke FL、Siddiqi T、Jacobson CA、Nikiforow S、Ahmed S、Miklos DB、Lin Y、Lunning MA
第一作者单位
Department of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, Moffit Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.United States
通讯作者单位
Department of Hematology and Oncology - Medicine, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Milwaukee, WI.United States
文献类型
荟萃分析 · 系统综述
期刊
Blood advances2025 Jun 10
原文标识
PubMed 39883946 · DOI 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013656