不适合移植的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤二线使用 axicabtagene ciloleucel:ALYCANTE 最终分析
Second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for transplantation: ALYCANTE final analysis.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Plain language summary of the ZUMA-7 study of axicabtagene ciloleucel versus standard of care for people with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma.
Plain language summary of the ZUMA-7 study of axicabtagene ciloleucel versus standard of care for people with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
这是什么摘要?这是名为ZUMA-7的临床研究的摘要。ZUMA-7研究了抗癌疗法axicabtagene ciloleucel(axi-cel)与标准治疗相比,对大型B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者的疗效。LBCL是一种影响一种称为B细胞的白细胞类型的癌症。Axi-cel是一种嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法。这种治疗由患者自身的免疫细胞制成,利用患者天然的免疫防御来对抗癌症。
该研究是如何进行的?ZUMA-7研究纳入了359名LBCL在一年内复发(relapsed)或对首次癌症治疗方案未完全应答(refractory)的患者。研究中的患者被随机分配到2个治疗组。180人接受axi-cel,179人接受标准治疗,即化疗和自体干细胞移植。在ZUMA-7结果公布之前,这种标准治疗是首次治疗无效的LBCL患者最有效的治疗。ZUMA-7的研究者通过观察axi-cel组的治疗效果以及患者出现的副作用(毒性),与标准治疗组进行比较,来确定axi-cel的获益。结果如何?在加入研究后2年时,axi-cel组患者在没有癌症恶化或需要新的癌症治疗的情况下生存的中位时间约为8个月,而基于化疗的标准治疗组患者为2个月。axi-cel组大多数患者在4年后仍然存活,但标准治疗组中有一半患者在治疗后约31个月内死亡。axi-cel 最常见的副作用由免疫系统过度活跃引起,结果意味着什么?与以化疗为基础的标准治疗相比,复发/难治性 LBCL 患者在接受 axi-cel 作为第二种抗肿瘤治疗时,生存期更长,癌症控制也更好。[框:见正文]。
What is this summary about? This is a summary of a clinical study called ZUMA-7. ZUMA-7 looked at how the anti-cancer therapy axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) compared with standard treatment for people with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). LBCL is a cancer that affects a type of white blood cell called B cells. Axi-cel is a type of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. This treatment is made from a person s own immune cells and uses a person s natural immune defences to fight cancer. How was the study conducted? The ZUMA-7 study was made up of 359 people whose LBCL came back (relapsed) within a year or did not fully respond (refractory) to their first cancer treatment plan. People in the study were randomly put into 2 treatment groups. 180 people were to get axi-cel,and 179 were to get standard-of-care treatment, which was chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Before the results of ZUMA-7, this standard treatment was the most effective treatment for people with LBCL whose first treatment did not work.
The researchers in ZUMA-7 determined the benefit of axi-cel by looking at how well the treatment worked and what side effects (toxicity) people had in the axi-cel group compared with the standard-of-care group. What were the results? At 2 years since joining the study, people in the axi-cel group lived without their cancer getting worse or needing new cancer treatment for a median time of about 8 months, compared with 2 months for people in the chemotherapy-based standard-of-care group.
Most people in the axi-cel group were still alive after 4 years, but half the people in the standard-of-care group had died within about 31 months of treatment. The most common side effects from axi-cel were caused by an overactive immune system and What do the results mean? People with relapsed or refractory LBCL live longer and have better control of their cancer when treated with axi-cel compared with chemotherapy-based standard of care as their second anti-cancer treatment. [Box: see text].
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。