← 返回

维泊妥珠单抗联合苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗治疗复发/难治性弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的疗效与安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析

英文原题:Efficacy and safety of polatuzumab-vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

查看英文原题

Efficacy and safety of polatuzumab-vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PubMed 2025/01/08(内容时间) Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Q1 · IF 6.2(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

Pola-BR 是治疗晚期 R/R DLBCL 的有效选择,但存在显著的血液学毒性,需要谨慎管理。仍需进一步开展高质量随机试验,以更好地理解和评估 Pola-BR 的疗效。为全面评估其有效性,与非细胞疗法的比较至关重要。

研究思路结论见上方概要

弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)是最常见的非霍奇金淋巴瘤亚型,40 %的病例在初始治疗后复发或难治(R/R)。这些患者的二线治疗之一是CAR-T 细胞疗法,其被视为金标准,且疗效优于SCT。对于这些患者,polatuzumab vedotin联合bendamustine和rituximab(Pola-BR)是一种新型治疗。本研究的主要目的是评估Pola-BR在R/R DLBCL患者中的疗效。

我们遵循PRISMA标准开展本系统评价与荟萃分析。检索自建库起至2024年5月,使用Cochrane Library、PubMed和ClinicalTrials.gov。纳入评估Pola-BR在R/R DLBCL患者中疗效的随机对照试验、观察性研究和单臂研究。总缓解率(ORR)、部分缓解(PR)和完全缓解(CR)为主要结局。采用随机效应模型,使用OpenMeta[Analyst]软件进行统计分析,得出合并风险比及95%置信区间(CIs)。

本研究纳入8项研究,共398例患者。这些研究质量较高,合并分析显示ORR为52.6%(95% CI:43.6 - 61.6%),CR为34.3%(95% CI:23.5 - 45.0%),PR为15.5%(95% CI:8.7 - 22.3%),均有统计学意义。观察到明显的血液学毒性,最常见的是中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、神经病变和贫血。

展开英文摘要原文

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common non-Hodgkin's lymphoma subtype, relapses or becomes refractory (R/R) in 40 % of cases after initial treatment. Among the second-line treatments for these patients is CAR T-cell therapy, which is considered the gold standard and treatment better than SCT. For these patients, polatuzumab vedotin in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (Pola-BR) is a novel treatment. The main goal of our research is to evaluate Pola-BR's efficacy in R/R DLBCL patients.

We followed PRISMA criteria for conducting this systematic review and meta-analysis. A search was conducted from the start until May 2024 using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov. Studies included randomized-controlled trials, observational studies, and single-arm studies assessing Pola-BR efficacy in R/R DLBCL patients. The overall response rate (ORR), partial response (PR), and complete response (CR) were the main outcomes. Using random-effect models, statistical analysis was carried out on OpenMeta[Analyst] software leading to pooled risk ratios with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).

Eight studies with 398 patients were present in our study. The studies were of high quality, with pooled analysis showing a significant ORR of 52.6 % (95 % CI: 43.6 - 61.6 %), CR of 34.3 % (95 % CI: 23.5 - 45.0 %), and PR of 15.5 % (95 % CI: 8.7 - 22.3 %). Significant hematologic toxicities were observed, the most common being, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, neuropathy, and anemia.

Pola-BR is an effective option for advanced R/R DLBCL but poses significant hematologic toxicity, requiring careful management. Further high-quality randomized trials are needed to better understand and evaluate Pola-BR's success. To fully assess its effectiveness, comparisons with non-cell therapies are essential.

论文信息

作者
Farooqi HA、Saffi Ullah M、Raza A、Sadiq Z、Shaikh WA、Muhammad R、Hussain MS
第一作者单位
Islamic International Medical College Riphah International University, Islamabad, Islamabad Capital Territory, Pakistan. Electronic address: hanzalaahmed554@gmail.com.
通讯作者单位
Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan. Electronic address: shoaib.m1857@gmail.com.
文献类型
系统综述 · 荟萃分析
期刊
Critical reviews in oncology/hematology2025 Mar
原文标识
PubMed 39793679 · DOI 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104611