CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Pretreatment pulmonary function testing has limited utility in B-cell lymphoma treated with CD19 CAR T cells.
Pretreatment pulmonary function testing has limited utility in B-cell lymphoma treated with CD19 CAR T cells.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
肺功能检查(PFTs)被推荐用于造血细胞移植(HCT)评估。然而,其在CAR-T 细胞治疗中的预后价值仍不明确。我们评估了PFTs及根据造血细胞移植合并症指数(HCT-CI)的肺部合并症分类在接受自体CD19 CAR-T 治疗的B细胞淋巴瘤患者中的预测意义。单中心回顾性分析纳入192例复发/难治性B细胞淋巴瘤(BCL)患者,接受商业化及即时制备的CD19靶向CAR-T 治疗。治疗前进行PFTs,并根据第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)和单次呼吸一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)将患者分为3个基于HCT-CI的肺部合并症等级。采用单因素和多因素Cox回归、logistic回归、Kaplan-Meier法及样条模型评估结局和毒性。
肺部合并症指标与总缓解率或免疫毒性(包括细胞因子释放综合征分级>2级和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性分级>2级)无关。分类FEV1、DLCO和肺部合并症等级与总生存期(OS;分别为P = .3、P = .4、P = .6)或无进展生存期(PFS;分别为P = .058、P > .9、P = .2)无关。在多因素模型中,FEV1作为连续变量与PFS降低相关(风险比,0.87;95%置信区间,0.78-0.96;P = .007)。样条模型显示FEV1与PFS之间呈线性相关。分类FEV1、DLCO和肺部合并症等级未能预测治疗疗效或毒性。FEV1作为连续测量指标是唯一与PFS相关的PFT测量指标,独立于OS或严重毒性。
Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are recommended for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) evaluation.
However, their prognostic value in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy remains unclear.
We assessed the predictive significance of PFTs and pulmonary comorbidity classifications, per the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI), in patients with B-cell lymphoma undergoing autologous CD19 CAR-T therapy. Single-center retrospective analysis encompassing 192 patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma (BCL), treated with commercial and point-of-care CD19-directed CAR-T therapy. Pretherapy PFTs were conducted, and patients were stratified into 3 HCT-CI-based pulmonary comorbidity grades, using forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and single-breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Outcomes and toxicities were evaluated using univariate and multivariable Cox regression, logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier method, and spline models.
Pulmonary comorbidity measures were not correlated with overall response rates or immune toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome grade >2 and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity grade >2. Categorical FEV1, DLCO, and pulmonary comorbidity level did not correlate with overall survival (OS; P = . 3, P = . 4, P = . 6, respectively) or progression-free survival (PFS; P = . 058, P > . 9, P = . 2, respectively).
FEV1 as a continuous measure was associated with reduced PFS in a multivariable model (hazard ratio, 0. 87; 95% confidence interval, 0. 78-0. 96; P = . 007). Spline modeling demonstrated a linear correlation between FEV1 and PFS. Categorical FEV1, DLCO, and pulmonary comorbidity level failed to predict therapy efficacy or toxicity. FEV1 as a continuous measure was the sole PFT measure associated with PFS, independent of OS or severe toxicities.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。