CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Outcomes of CD19 CAR T in Transformed Indolent Lymphoma Compared to De Novo Aggressive Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
Outcomes of CD19 CAR T in Transformed Indolent Lymphoma Compared to De Novo Aggressive Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法已改变侵袭性大B细胞淋巴瘤(aLBCL)的治疗格局。关键CAR临床试验纳入了惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤转化患者(tiNHL),但CAR疗法在这一既往被认为高危的独特人群中的结局尚不明确。研究者开展多中心回顾性研究,纳入2017至2022年间接受标准治疗CAR-T 的1182名aLBCL患者,其中338人(29%)患tiNHL。tiNHL组与新发aLBCL组的3级细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)发生率相近(7%比8%,p=0.6),而tiNHL组3级免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征发生率较低(21%比27%,p=0.02)。两组总缓解率相近(83%比81%,p=0.3),但tiNHL组完全缓解率较高(67%比59%,p=0.017)。
中位随访22.3个月时,tiNHL组与新发组的无进展/无复发生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)相近:24个月PFS分别为41%(95%置信区间:35%–46%)和38%(35%–42%);24个月OS分别为58%(52%–63%)和52%(48%–56%)。校正主要危险因素后,与新发aLBCL患者相比,tiNHL患者CAR治疗后疾病进展、复发或死亡风险呈较低趋势(HR:0.84,95%置信区间:0.69–1.0,p=0.07)。LDH升高、疾病分期晚、CAR治疗前12个月内使用过苯达莫司汀、接受桥接治疗、中枢神经系统受累以及既往接受过3线治疗均与较差PFS相关。
总之,CAR-T 疗法对tiNHL患者疗效显著且毒性可接受。
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized treatment of aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (aLBCL). Patients with transformed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (tiNHL) were included in key CAR trials, but outcomes of CAR for this distinct, historically high-risk group are poorly understood.
We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of 1182 patients with aLBCL receiving standard-of-care CAR T between 2017 and 2022, including 338 (29%) with tiNHL. Rates of grade 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) were similar between tiNHL and de novo cohorts (7% vs. 8%, p = 0. 6), while grade 3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was lower in tiNHL (21% vs. 27%, p = 0. 02).
Overall response rate was similar in both cohorts (83% vs. 81%, p = 0. 3), while complete response rate was higher in tiNHL (67% vs. 59%, p = 0. 017). With a median follow-up of 22. 3 months, the progression/relapse-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar between the tiNHL and de novo cohorts (24-month PFS 41% [95% CI: 35%-46%] vs. 38% [95% CI: 35%-42%]; 24-month OS 58% [95% CI: 52%-63%] vs. 52% [95% CI: 48%-56%], respectively).
After adjusting for key risk factors, there was a trend toward a lower hazard of disease progression, relapse or death post-CAR for tiNHL patients compared to de novo aLBCL patients (HR: 0. 84 [95% CI: 0. 69-1. 0], p = 0. 07). Elevated LDH, advanced stage, prior bendamustine within 12 months of CAR, receipt of bridging therapy, CNS involvement, and 3 prior lines of therapy were each associated with inferior PFS.
In conclusion, CAR T therapy is highly effective with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with tiNHL.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。