工程化益生菌用于肿瘤靶向联合化学免疫治疗
Engineered probiotics for tumor-targeted combination chemoimmunotherapy.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Combined immunotherapy with dendritic cells and cytokine-induced killer cells for solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Combined immunotherapy with dendritic cells and cytokine-induced killer cells for solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
DC-CIK 免疫治疗对实体瘤显示出良好的疗效和安全性,可提高生存率和缓解率。需要进一步研究以优化治疗方案并确定预测因素。
利用树突状细胞(DC)和细胞因子诱导的杀伤(CIK)细胞的免疫治疗是实体瘤的一种有前景的治疗方法。本系统综述和meta分析旨在通过评估相关随机对照试验中的总生存期、无进展生存期、总缓解率、疾病控制率和不良事件,来评价DC-CIK免疫治疗的有效性和安全性。本分析的结果将有助于优化治疗策略并改善癌症免疫治疗的结局。
本系统评价和meta分析遵循PRISMA指南。我们在多个数据库上进行了全面检索,以寻找研究DC-CIK免疫疗法联合治疗实体瘤的RCT。纳入标准为比较DC-CIK免疫疗法与对照治疗并报告OS、PFS、ORR或DCR的RCT。两名作者独立进行研究选择和数据提取,分歧通过共识或与第三名评价者协商解决。提取的数据包括研究特征、参与者信息、干预措施、结局和质量评估。使用Review Manager和Stata软件进行统计分析。使用卡方和I-squared统计量评估异质性。计划进行敏感性分析和发表偏倚评估。
共初步检索到1013条记录,经过严格筛选后,13项随机对照试验(RCT)被纳入meta分析。这些研究共涉及1443例患者,其中730例接受DC-CIK免疫治疗,713例为对照组。纳入研究涵盖多种癌症类型,大多数在中国大陆进行。meta分析显示,与对照治疗相比,DC-CIK免疫治疗与总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)改善相关。此外,与非DC-CIK治疗相比,DC-CIK免疫治疗显示出更高的总缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)。两组均报告了不良事件,发热在DC-CIK免疫治疗组更常见,骨髓抑制和胃肠道反应在对照组更常见。敏感性分析证实了结果的稳定性,而PFS和发热存在发表偏倚。
Immunotherapy utilizing dendritic cells (DCs) and cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells is a promising treatment approach for solid tumors. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DC-CIK immunotherapy by assessing overall survival, progression-free survival, overall response rate, disease control rate, and adverse events in relevant randomized controlled trials. The results of this analysis will contribute to optimizing treatment strategies and improving cancer immunotherapy outcomes. METHOD: This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted on multiple databases for RCTs studying the combination of DC-CIK immunotherapy for solid tumors. Inclusion criteria were RCTs comparing DC-CIK immunotherapy with control therapy and reporting OS, PFS, ORR, or DCR. Two authors independently performed study selection and data extraction, with disagreements resolved through consensus or consultation with a third reviewer. Extracted data included study characteristics, participant information, interventions, outcomes, and quality assessment. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager and Stata software. Heterogeneity was assessed using chi-square and I-squared statistics. Sensitivity analysis and assessment of publication bias were planned.
A total of 1013 records were initially retrieved, and after a thorough screening process, 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis. These studies involved a total of 1443 patients, with 730 receiving DC-CIK immunotherapy and 713 in the control groups. The included studies covered various cancer types, with the majority conducted in mainland China. The meta-analysis showed that DC-CIK immunotherapy was associated with improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to control therapy. Furthermore, DC-CIK immunotherapy demonstrated higher overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) compared to non-DC-CIK therapy. Adverse events were reported in both groups, with fever being more common in the DC-CIK immunotherapy group and bone marrow suppression and gastrointestinal reactions more common in the control group. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of the results, while publication bias was observed for PFS and fever.
DC-CIK immunotherapy shows promising efficacy and safety for solid tumors, improving survival rates and response rates. Further research is needed to optimize treatment regimens and identify predictive factors.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。