← 返回

亚洲多种族人群中一线 R-CHOP(类)方案治疗弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的真实世界结局

英文原题:Real-world outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with frontline R-CHOP(-like) regimens in an Asian multi-ethnic population.

查看英文原题

Real-world outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with frontline R-CHOP(-like) regimens in an Asian multi-ethnic population.

PubMed 2024/11/15(内容时间) Ann Hematol Q3 · IF 2.3(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

我们的研究表明,与全球研究结果相比,我们本地人群的 DLBCL 具有相似的临床病理和预后特征。

中文摘要

近期DLBCL治疗取得突破,例如抗体药物偶联物维泊妥珠单抗首次在利妥昔单抗时代20年来显示出较R-CHOP(利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松龙)更好的临床生存获益。因此,我们考察多族裔亚洲人群中DLBCL标准化学免疫治疗的结局,以确定现实临床中采用新疗法的需求。

我们回顾性研究了2010至2022年在新加坡国家癌症中心确诊DLBCL并接受一线利妥昔单抗方案治疗的患者(n=1,071)。随访中位时间为48个月。采用Kaplan-Meier法和多变量Cox比例风险模型进行生存分析。

队列包括590名男性和481名女性,年龄中位数为63.8岁(范围19.3至93.6岁)。多数患者确诊时为III至IV期(60.9%),按Han标准属非生发中心B细胞样亚型(56.5%)。绝大多数患者接受R-CHOP类方案(n=997,93.1%),包括95例接受利妥昔单抗、依托泊苷、泼尼松、长春新碱、环磷酰胺和多柔比星(EPOCH-R);5年无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为64.5%和74.7%。男性(p=0.0294)、年龄>60岁(p<0.0001)、ECOG评分较差(2至4分,p<0.0001)、晚期(III至IV期,p<0.0001)、存在B症状(p=0.0305)和LDH升高(p=0.0161)是OS的独立预测因素,其中4项为国际预后指数(IPI)危险因素。在中危至高危亚组(IPI评分2至5分;n=752)中,5年PFS和OS分别仅为59.0%和69.8%。EBV状态、MYC及/或BCL2/BCL6重排与生存结局无显著相关。MYC重排患者(n=82,p<0.0001)更常接受EPOCH-R而非R-CHOP,包括MYC/BCL2双打击遗传特征患者(n=31,p<0.0001)。值得注意的是,在MYC重排DLBCL(PFS:HR=0.60,p=0.1704;OS:HR=0.49,p=0.0852)和MYC/BCL2双打击DLBCL(PFS:HR=1.30,p=0.6433;OS:HR=1.02,p=0.9803)中,两种方案均未显著影响生存结局。

与全球研究结果相比,本地患者群体的DLBCL临床病理及预后特征相似。本研究也凸显R-CHOP类方案在当代DLBCL管理中的局限,以及持续改进治疗策略的必要性。

展开英文摘要原文

Recent breakthrough advances in the treatment of DLBCL, such as the antibody-drug conjugate polatuzumab vedotin, have yielded clinical survival benefit over rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (R-CHOP) for the first time in 20 years since the advent of the rituximab era. We thus examine the outcomes of standard immunochemotherapy for DLBCL in our multi-ethnic Asian population, so as to determine the real-world clinical need to adopt new therapeutics in this disease entity.

We conducted a retrospective study involving patients (n = 1071) diagnosed with DLBCL at the National Cancer Centre Singapore from 2010 to 2022, and treated with first-line rituximab-based regimens. The median follow-up duration was 48 months. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional models.

The cohort consisted of 590 male and 481 female patients with a median age of 63.8 years (range, 19.3-93.6). Most were stage III-IV at diagnosis (60.9%) and of non-germinal center B-cell like (non-GCB) subtype by Han's criteria (56.5%). The vast majority received R-CHOP(-like) regimens (n = 997, 93.1%), including rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin (EPOCH-R) (n = 95), achieving a 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 64.5% and 74.7% respectively. Male sex (p = 0.0294), age > 60 years (p < 0.0001), poor ECOG scores (2-4) (p < 0.0001), advanced stage (III-IV) (p < 0.0001), presence of B-symptoms (p = 0.0305), and raised LDH (p = 0.0161) were independent predictors of OS, 4 of which are risk factors in the International Prognostic Index (IPI). In the intermediate to high-risk subgroup (IPI scores 2-5; n = 752), the 5-year PFS and OS were only 59.0% and 69.8% respectively. EBV status, MYC and/or BCL2/BCL6 rearrangements, were not significantly associated with survival outcomes. EPOCH-R was used more frequently than R-CHOP in patients with MYC rearrangements (n = 82, p < 0.0001), including those with MYC/BCL2 double-hit genetics (n = 31, p < 0.0001). Notably, neither regimen significantly affected survival outcomes, both in MYC-rearranged (PFS: HR 0.60, p = 0.1704; OS: HR 0.49, p = 0.0852), and in MYC/BCL2 double-hit DLBCL (PFS: HR 1.30, p = 0.6433; OS: HR 1.02, p = 0.9803).

Our study demonstrates that our local population has similar clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of DLBCL as compared to global findings. It also highlights the limitations of R-CHOP(-like) regimens in contemporary DLBCL management and therefore an ongoing need for improved therapeutic strategies.

论文信息

作者
Lim RMH、Tan JY、Tan YH、Heng ZEQ、Ng LCK、Lim FLWI、Goh YT、Lim ST
第一作者单位
Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Blvd, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.Singapore
通讯作者单位
Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Blvd, Singapore, 168583, Singapore. jason.chan.y.s@nccs.com.sg.Singapore
期刊
Annals of hematology2024 Dec
原文标识
PubMed 39542909 · DOI 10.1007/s00277-024-06067-2