不适合移植的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤二线使用 axicabtagene ciloleucel:ALYCANTE 最终分析
Second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for transplantation: ALYCANTE final analysis.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Real-world outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with frontline R-CHOP(-like) regimens in an Asian multi-ethnic population.
Real-world outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with frontline R-CHOP(-like) regimens in an Asian multi-ethnic population.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
我们的研究表明,与全球研究结果相比,我们本地人群的 DLBCL 具有相似的临床病理和预后特征。
近期DLBCL治疗取得突破,例如抗体药物偶联物维泊妥珠单抗首次在利妥昔单抗时代20年来显示出较R-CHOP(利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松龙)更好的临床生存获益。因此,我们考察多族裔亚洲人群中DLBCL标准化学免疫治疗的结局,以确定现实临床中采用新疗法的需求。
我们回顾性研究了2010至2022年在新加坡国家癌症中心确诊DLBCL并接受一线利妥昔单抗方案治疗的患者(n=1,071)。随访中位时间为48个月。采用Kaplan-Meier法和多变量Cox比例风险模型进行生存分析。
队列包括590名男性和481名女性,年龄中位数为63.8岁(范围19.3至93.6岁)。多数患者确诊时为III至IV期(60.9%),按Han标准属非生发中心B细胞样亚型(56.5%)。绝大多数患者接受R-CHOP类方案(n=997,93.1%),包括95例接受利妥昔单抗、依托泊苷、泼尼松、长春新碱、环磷酰胺和多柔比星(EPOCH-R);5年无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为64.5%和74.7%。男性(p=0.0294)、年龄>60岁(p<0.0001)、ECOG评分较差(2至4分,p<0.0001)、晚期(III至IV期,p<0.0001)、存在B症状(p=0.0305)和LDH升高(p=0.0161)是OS的独立预测因素,其中4项为国际预后指数(IPI)危险因素。在中危至高危亚组(IPI评分2至5分;n=752)中,5年PFS和OS分别仅为59.0%和69.8%。EBV状态、MYC及/或BCL2/BCL6重排与生存结局无显著相关。MYC重排患者(n=82,p<0.0001)更常接受EPOCH-R而非R-CHOP,包括MYC/BCL2双打击遗传特征患者(n=31,p<0.0001)。值得注意的是,在MYC重排DLBCL(PFS:HR=0.60,p=0.1704;OS:HR=0.49,p=0.0852)和MYC/BCL2双打击DLBCL(PFS:HR=1.30,p=0.6433;OS:HR=1.02,p=0.9803)中,两种方案均未显著影响生存结局。
与全球研究结果相比,本地患者群体的DLBCL临床病理及预后特征相似。本研究也凸显R-CHOP类方案在当代DLBCL管理中的局限,以及持续改进治疗策略的必要性。
Recent breakthrough advances in the treatment of DLBCL, such as the antibody-drug conjugate polatuzumab vedotin, have yielded clinical survival benefit over rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (R-CHOP) for the first time in 20 years since the advent of the rituximab era. We thus examine the outcomes of standard immunochemotherapy for DLBCL in our multi-ethnic Asian population, so as to determine the real-world clinical need to adopt new therapeutics in this disease entity.
We conducted a retrospective study involving patients (n = 1071) diagnosed with DLBCL at the National Cancer Centre Singapore from 2010 to 2022, and treated with first-line rituximab-based regimens. The median follow-up duration was 48 months. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional models.
The cohort consisted of 590 male and 481 female patients with a median age of 63.8 years (range, 19.3-93.6). Most were stage III-IV at diagnosis (60.9%) and of non-germinal center B-cell like (non-GCB) subtype by Han's criteria (56.5%). The vast majority received R-CHOP(-like) regimens (n = 997, 93.1%), including rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin (EPOCH-R) (n = 95), achieving a 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 64.5% and 74.7% respectively. Male sex (p = 0.0294), age > 60 years (p < 0.0001), poor ECOG scores (2-4) (p < 0.0001), advanced stage (III-IV) (p < 0.0001), presence of B-symptoms (p = 0.0305), and raised LDH (p = 0.0161) were independent predictors of OS, 4 of which are risk factors in the International Prognostic Index (IPI). In the intermediate to high-risk subgroup (IPI scores 2-5; n = 752), the 5-year PFS and OS were only 59.0% and 69.8% respectively. EBV status, MYC and/or BCL2/BCL6 rearrangements, were not significantly associated with survival outcomes. EPOCH-R was used more frequently than R-CHOP in patients with MYC rearrangements (n = 82, p < 0.0001), including those with MYC/BCL2 double-hit genetics (n = 31, p < 0.0001). Notably, neither regimen significantly affected survival outcomes, both in MYC-rearranged (PFS: HR 0.60, p = 0.1704; OS: HR 0.49, p = 0.0852), and in MYC/BCL2 double-hit DLBCL (PFS: HR 1.30, p = 0.6433; OS: HR 1.02, p = 0.9803).
Our study demonstrates that our local population has similar clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of DLBCL as compared to global findings. It also highlights the limitations of R-CHOP(-like) regimens in contemporary DLBCL management and therefore an ongoing need for improved therapeutic strategies.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。