CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in distal extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma.
Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in distal extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
sTILs 在预测生存方面优于 iTILs,且被证明是 DBDC 患者的强预后指标,无论分期如何。sTILs 的效用可能不仅限于预后判断,还有助于预测 DBDC 患者的治疗反应。
TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TILs)的评估已推动了多种免疫疗法的发展,其在胃肠道恶性肿瘤中还具有预测潜力。然而,TILs在远端肝外胆管癌(DBDC)中的临床病理及预后价值尚未得到充分阐明。
我们评估了405例手术切除的DBDC中的间质TILs(sTILs)和上皮内TILs(iTILs),以分析它们与总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)的相关性,并根据美国癌症联合委员会第八版方案与临床病理参数的相关性。
高水平的sTIL密度(sTIL High;>5%)和iTIL计数(iTIL High;>3)分别在245例(61%)和74例(18%)中发现。sTIL High更常见于较大肿瘤(P = 0.048)、弥漫累及胰内和胰外胆管(P = 0.013)、T分期较低的肿瘤(P = 0.002)以及无胰腺(P = 0.003)或十二指肠侵犯(P < 0.001)的肿瘤。iTIL High与具有乳头状或结节状生长模式(P < 0.001)且无神经周围侵犯(P = 0.006)的肿瘤相关。sTIL High和iTIL High均显著预测更好的OS(分别为P = 0.009和0.036)和RFS(分别为P = 0.003和0.026)。sTIL在OS中始终提供预后预测能力,即使使用不同的定量截断值进行检验,并在多变量分析中对OS(P = 0.006)和RFS(P = 0.005)进行预后分层后亦然。sTIL High的生存获益在不同分期中均持续存在,无论是OS(较低分期I和II期P = 0.010,较高分期III和IV期P = 0.001)还是RFS(较低分期和较高分期肿瘤分别为P = 0.004和0.025)。
The assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has led to the development of various immunotherapies beyond their predictive potential in gastrointestinal malignancies. However, the clinicopathologic and prognostic values of TILs have yet to be well elucidated in distal extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma (DBDC).
We evaluated stromal TILs (sTILs) and intraepithelial TILs (iTILs) in 405 surgically resected DBDCs to analyze their correlations with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and with clinicopathologic parameters according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer scheme.
High levels of sTIL density (sTIL High ; >5%) and iTIL count (iTIL High ; >3) were found in 245 (61%) and 74 cases (18%), respectively. sTIL High was more commonly found in larger tumors (P = 0.048) diffusely involving both intra- and extrapancreatic bile ducts (P = 0.013), in tumors with lower T category (P = 0.002), and in tumors without pancreatic (P = 0.003) or duodenal invasion (P < 0.001). iTIL High was associated with tumors with papillary or nodular growth pattern (P < 0.001) without perineural invasion (P = 0.006). Both sTIL High and iTIL High significantly predicted better OS (P = 0.009 and 0.036, respectively) and RFS (P = 0.003 and 0.026, respectively). sTIL consistently provided prognostic predictability in OS, even when tested with different quantitative cut-offs and prognostically stratified OS (P = 0.006) and RFS (P = 0.005) on multivariate analysis. The survival benefit of sTIL High persisted regardless of the stage in both OS (P = 0.010 for lower stages I and II and P = 0.001 for higher stages III and IV) and RFS (P = 0.004 and 0.025 for lower- and higher-stage tumors, respectively).
sTILs were superior to iTILs in predicting survival, and it was shown to be a strong prognosticator for DBDC patients regardless of the stage. The utility of sTILs may extend beyond prognostication to aid in predicting therapeutic responses in DBDC patients.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。