为肝细胞癌武装 GPC3 CAR-T 细胞:多少才足够,下一步是什么?
Armouring GPC3 CAR T cells for hepatocellular carcinoma: how much is enough and what comes next?
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Plasma exchange as an effective treatment for cytokine release syndrome following T cell receptor‑engineered T cell immunotherapy: A case report.
Plasma exchange as an effective treatment for cytokine release syndrome following T cell receptor‑engineered T cell immunotherapy: A case report.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
T细胞受体工程化T细胞(TCR-T)免疫疗法是治疗实体瘤的一种有前景的方法。然而,TCR-T治疗可能引发严重的细胞因子释放综合征(CRS),从而限制其治疗应用。
本研究报告一例TCR-T相关CRS患者,经血浆置换(PE)治疗后成功控制。患者为35岁男性,患有乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)相关肝细胞癌(HCC)并伴肺转移;在多线靶向免疫治疗及局部治疗失败后,入组一项使用表达HBV表面抗原特异性TCR的自体T细胞治疗HBV相关HCC的临床试验。采集外周血单个核细胞、进行工程化改造和淋巴细胞清除化疗后,患者接受TCR-T输注。
然而,工程化T细胞回输后,患者出现发热、低血压、水肿、多部位浆膜腔积液和急性肾损伤,随后诊断为3级CRS并转入重症监护病房。患者接受了连续3天每日一次PE(每次置换3,000 mL新鲜冰冻血浆)、肾脏替代治疗、托珠单抗以及连续3天每日1,000 mg甲泼尼龙冲击治疗。治疗后,患者血流动力学状态稳定,C反应蛋白、铁蛋白和IL-6水平均明显下降。随访期间,肝癌和肺转移灶均保持疾病稳定。据我们所知,这是首例报道在实体瘤TCR-T治疗后采用PE处理CRS的病例。
本研究显示,PE等血液净化治疗可靶向炎症介质并恢复促炎与抗炎细胞因子平衡,可能是管理工程化T细胞治疗相关严重CRS的重要措施。
然而,仍需开展更多临床和转化研究,以进一步理解T细胞免疫疗法治疗实体瘤患者的机制。
T-cell receptor-engineered T-cell (TCR-T) immunotherapy is a promising approach for the treatment of solid tumors.
However, TCR-T therapy can result in severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS), thus limiting its therapeutic application. The present study reported the case of a patient with TCR-T-related CRS, which was treated successfully with plasma exchange (PE).
A 35-year-old male patient, who was diagnosed with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with lung metastases, was enrolled in a clinical trial for hepatitis B virus surface antigen-specific TCR-expressing autologous T-cell therapy for HBV-related HCC after failing multiple lines of targeted immunotherapy and local treatments.
Therefore, TCR-Ts were infused after peripheral blood mononuclear cell collection, engineering and lymphodepletion chemotherapy.
However, following engineered T-cell reinfusion, the patient developed a fever, hypotension, edema, multiple serous effusion and acute kidney injury, and was consequently diagnosed with grade 3 CRS and transferred to the Intensive Care Unit. The patient received three daily PE sessions (3,000 ml of fresh frozen plasma per session), renal replacement therapy, tocilizumab and 1,000 mg pulse methylprednisolone for 3 days. Following treatment, the patient's hemodynamic condition was stabilized and the C-reactive protein, ferritin and IL-6 levels were markedly reduced.
During follow-up, a stable disease state was exhibited by the liver cancer and lung metastatic lesions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reporting PE as a treatment approach for managing CRS following TCR-T therapy for solid tumors. The present study demonstrated that blood purification treatments, such as PE, which target inflammatory mediators and restore the balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, could be a notable component in managing severe CRS associated with engineered T-cell treatment.
However, additional clinical and translational studies are needed to further understand the mechanisms of T-cell immunotherapy to treat patients with solid tumors.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。