CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Development and validation of the post-CAR prognostic index for large B-cell lymphoma patients after CAR-T progression in third or later line treatment.
Development and validation of the post-CAR prognostic index for large B-cell lymphoma patients after CAR-T progression in third or later line treatment.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
超过60%的复发/难治性(R/R)大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者在三线或更后线治疗中接受嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗后,未能获得持久应答。CAR-T 治疗失败后,患者生存结局存在异质性,而该患者群体尚缺乏预后模型。
我们利用来自西班牙12家中心、CAR-T 治疗后发生疾病进展(PD)的216例患者组成训练队列,开发CAR后预后指数(PC-PI);主要终点为CAR-T 进展后的总生存期(OS)。另以来自欧洲其他三家中心的外部队列(n=204)进行验证。预后评分纳入CAR-T 后发生PD时评估的五项变量:ECOG评分>0、血红蛋白<10 g/dL、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)>正常值上限(ULN)的2倍、结外病灶数>1,以及CAR-T 至PD的时间<4个月。患者被分为四个OS不同的风险组(所有组间比较p<0.05)。在验证队列中,低危(31%)、中低危(26%)、中高危(17%)和高危(26%)组的OS中位数分别为15.7、7.1、1.8和1.0个月(所有组间比较p<0.05)。对后续治疗进行校正后,结果仍然一致。在外部队列中,PC-PI的C统计量为0.79(95% CI:0.76至0.82),优于IPI和R-IPI。
总之,PC-PI是一种用于预测OS的新工具,可助力CAR-T 治疗后复发LBCL患者开展基于风险的管理。此外,这些结果也有助于纳入CAR-T 暴露患者的临床试验及真实世界数据研究中的分层与结果解读。
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy fails to achieve durable responses in over 60% of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients in the third or later line setting. After CAR-T failure, survival outcomes are heterogeneous and a prognostic model in this patient population is lacking. A training cohort of 216 patients with progressive disease (PD) after CAR-T from 12 Spanish centers was used to develop the Post-CAR Prognostic Index (PC-PI); primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from CAR-T progression. Validation was performed in an external cohort from three different European centers (n = 204).
The prognostic score incorporated five variables, assessed at time of PD to CAR-T: ECOG (> 0), hemoglobin (< 10 g/dL), LDH ( 2xULN), number of extranodal sites (> 1) and time from CAR-T to PD (< 4 months). Patients were classified in four risk groups with distinct OS (p-value < 0. 05 in all comparisons).
In the validation cohort, median OS in the low (31%), intermediate-low (26%), intermediate-high (17%) and high risk (26%) were 15. 7, 7. 1, 1. 8 and 1. 0 months, respectively (p < 0. 05 in all comparisons). Results were consistent following adjustment for subsequent treatment. In the external cohort, the PC-PI showed a C-statistic of 0. 79 (95%CI 0. 76-0. 82), outperforming IPI and R-IPI.
In conclusion, the PC-PI score is a novel tool for OS prediction and could facilitate risk-adapted management of LBCL patients relapsing after CAR T-cells.
Additionally, these results will help stratification and interpretation of trials and real-world data incorporating CART-exposed patients.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。