CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Shift from Widespread to Tailored Antifungal Prophylaxis in Lymphoma Patients Treated with CD19 CAR T Cell Therapy: Results from a Large Retrospective Cohort.
Shift from Widespread to Tailored Antifungal Prophylaxis in Lymphoma Patients Treated with CD19 CAR T Cell Therapy: Results from a Large Retrospective Cohort.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
接受 CD19 嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞治疗的患者存在多种免疫缺陷,可能使其更易感染。侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)是血液系统疾病患者可能发生的危及生命事件,但该特定患者群体抗真菌预防的最佳作用和持续时间仍有争议。
本研究旨在全面概述 IFI 预防策略随时间的演变,并评估接受 CAR-T 治疗的复发/难治性(R/R)淋巴瘤患者队列中 IFI 发生率。
我们对 2016 年 4 月至 2023 年 3 月期间接受 CD19 CAR-T 治疗的 R/R B 细胞淋巴瘤患者开展单中心回顾性研究。A 组(2016 年 4 月至 2020 年 8 月)患者主要接受 fluconazole,未根据个体 IFI 风险分层;B 组(2020 年 9 月至 2023 年 3 月)仅建议高危患者接受抗真菌预防。共纳入 330 例患者。A 组 119/142 例(84%)和 B 组 58/188 例(31%)接受抗真菌预防(P < 0.001)。A 组 8 例(5.6%)和 B 组 21 例(11.2%)使用抗霉菌唑类药物。
A 组 42 例(29%)更换了另一种抗真菌药,其中 9 例(21%)因毒性更换,包括 6 例转氨酶升高和 3 例 QTc 延长。B 组 21 例(11.2%)更换抗真菌药,主要依据修订指南由 fluconazole 或 micafungin 改用抗霉菌药物。输注时、第 10 天和第 30 天两组肝毒性无差异,各组整体也未见显著差异。CAR-T 后 IFI 罕见:A 组 1 例隐球菌性脑膜脑炎(0.7%),B 组 1 例侵袭性曲霉病(0.5%),两例均发生于 micafungin 预防期间。在这一大型单中心 CAR-T 治疗 R/R 淋巴瘤队列中,个体化预防并谨慎管理 CAR-T 相关 CRS 等毒性,与极低 IFI 发生率相关,同时避免了不必要毒性、药物相互作用和高额成本。
Patients undergoing CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy exhibit multiple immune deficits that may increase their susceptibility to infections. Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are life-threatening events in the setting of hematologic diseases.
However, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal role and duration of antifungal prophylaxis in this specific patient population. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of IFI prophylactic strategies over time and to assess IFI incidence rates in a cohort of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) lymphoma treated with CAR-T cell therapy.
A single-center retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of patients with R/R B cell lymphoma treated with CD19 CAR-T cell therapy between April 2016 and March 2023. Group A (April 2016-August 2020) consisted of patients primarily treated with fluconazole, irrespective of their individual IFI risk profile. In Group B (September 2020-March 2023) antifungal prophylaxis was recommended only for high-risk patients.
Overall, 330 patients were included. Antifungal prophylaxis was prescribed to 119/142 (84%) patients in Group A and 58/188 (31%) in Group B (P < . 001). Anti-mold azoles were prescribed to 8 (5. 6%) patients in Group A and 21 (11. 2%) patients in Group B. In Group A, 42 (29%) patients were switched to another antifungal, 9 (21%) because of toxicity, with 6 cases of transaminitis and 3 cases of prolonged QTc. In Group B, 21 (11. 2%) patients were switched to the antifungal drug, mainly from fluconazole or micafungin to a mold-active agent following revised guidelines. No difference was found in liver toxicity between the two groups at infusion, day 10, and day 30.
No significant differences were observed between the groups. IFIs following CAR-T cell therapy were rare, with 1 case of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis in group A (. 7%) and 1 case of invasive aspergillosis in Group B (. 5%), both occurring in patients on micafungin prophylaxis.
In this large single-center cohort of patients with R/R lymphoma treated with CAR-T cells, we show that individualized prophylaxis, alongside careful management of CAR-T cell-related toxicities such as CRS, was associated with a very low IFI rate, avoiding the risk of unnecessary toxicities, drug-drug interactions, and high costs.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。