← 返回

桥接放疗在接受 CAR-T 治疗的复发/难治性弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中的作用:一项多中心研究

英文原题:Role of bridging RT in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma undergoing CAR-T therapy: a multicenter study.

查看英文原题

Role of bridging RT in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma undergoing CAR-T therapy: a multicenter study.

PubMed 2024/10/09(内容时间) Bone Marrow Transplant Q1 · IF 5.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者 CAR-T 细胞治疗前桥接方案的优化可能影响疗效和结局。本回顾性研究评估放疗(RT)及其他桥接策略后的 CAR-T 治疗结局。在 148 例复发/难治性 DLBCL 患者中,31 例接受 RT 桥接,84 例接受化疗(CT)桥接,33 例未桥接或仅接受类固醇治疗。RT 组、CT 组和未桥接组分别有 96.8%、89.2% 和 78.8% 患者最终接受 CAR-T 细胞输注(p = 0.079)。

总体而言,桥接治疗应答较差,但 RT 患者桥接前后乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平显著下降(p = 0.05)。RT 组、CT 组和未桥接组 1 年无进展生存率分别为 51.2%、28.2% 和 47.6%(CT 桥接对比 RT 桥接,p = 0.044);1 年总生存率分别为 86.7%、52.7% 和 69%(CT 桥接对比 RT 桥接,p = 0.025)。CT 组 ICANS 发生率高于其他组(CT 组 20.0%、RT 组 3.3%、未桥接组 7.7%;p = 0.05)。

总之,RT 桥接与较低的脱落率和 CAR-T 毒性相关;对于局限性疾病患者或只有一个主要症状病灶的患者,RT 可能优于其他桥接策略。

展开英文摘要原文

The optimization of bridging regimen before chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may impact CAR-T efficacy and outcome. This retrospective study evaluates CAR-T outcome after bridging with radiotherapy (RT) and other bridging strategies. Among 148 patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL who underwent leukapheresis for CAR-T manufacturing, 31 received RT-bridging, 84 chemotherapy (CT), 33 no-bridging or steroid-only. CAR-T cell were infused in 96.

8% of RT-group, 89. 2% of CT-group and 78. 8% of no-bridge-group (p = 0. 079). Response to bridging was generally poor, but patients receiving RT had a significant reduction in LDH levels between pre- and post-bridging (p = 0. 05). The one-year PFS was 51. 2% in the RT-group, 28. 2% in the CT-group, and 47. 6% in the no-bridge-group (p = 0. 044, CT-bridging vs RT-bridging); 1-year OS was 86. 7% in the RT-group, 52. 7% in the CT-group and 69% in the no-bridge-group (p = 0. 025, CT-bridging vs RT-bridging).

We observed a higher incidence of ICANS in patients who received CT than in others (20. 0% CT-group, 3. 3% RT-group, 7. 7% no-bridge group; p = 0. 05).

In conclusion, RT-bridging is associated with lower drop-out rate and CAR-T toxicity, and it might be preferred to other bridging strategies for patients with localized disease or for those with one prevalent symptomatic site.

论文信息

作者
Bramanti S、Mannina D、Chiappella A、Casadei B、De Philippis C、Giordano L、Navarria P、Mancosu P
第一作者单位
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas, Cancer Center, Milano, Rozzano Milano, Italy.Italy
通讯作者单位
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas, Cancer Center, Milano, Rozzano Milano, Italy. daniele.mannina@humanitas.it.Italy
文献类型
多中心研究
期刊
Bone marrow transplantation2025 Jan
原文标识
PubMed 39384870 · DOI 10.1038/s41409-024-02427-8