← 返回

基于 18F-FDG PET/CT 指标的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤 CAR-T 细胞治疗分层:免疫抑制性肿瘤微环境作为高肿瘤负荷患者的不良预后指标

英文原题:18F-FDG PET/CT metrics-based stratification of large B-cell lymphoma receiving CAR-T cell therapy: immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment as a negative prognostic indicator in patients with high tumor burden.

查看英文原题

18F-FDG PET/CT metrics-based stratification of large B-cell lymphoma receiving CAR-T cell therapy: immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment as a negative prognostic indicator in patients with high tumor burden.

PubMed 2024/09/14(内容时间) Biomark Res Q1 · IF 14.6(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法极大地改善了复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者的预后。早期识别和干预可能对CAR-T 细胞疗法反应不佳的患者将有助于提高疗效。分析了来自中国队列的90例接受CAR-T 细胞疗法并在筛选阶段(中位至输注时间53.5天,范围27-176天)、CAR-T 细胞输注后1个月和3个月接受18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(18F-FDG PET/CT)扫描的患者,并对47例患者在筛选阶段进行了RNA测序。筛选阶段最大病灶最大直径(Dmax)< 6 cm(N = 60)的患者,其3个月完全缓解率(85.0% vs. 33.3%,P < 0.001)、无进展生存期(HR 0.17;95% CI 0.08-0.35,P < 0.001)和总生存期(HR 0.18;95% CI 0.08-0.40,P < 0.001)均显著高于Dmax 6 cm(N = 30)的患者。

此外,在筛选阶段,Dmax联合结外受累在区分患者结局方面更有效。筛选阶段总代谢肿瘤体积(tMTV)和总病灶糖酵解(tTLG)的最佳截断值分别为50cm 3和500 g。建立了一个结合CAR-T 细胞治疗后1个月(M1)最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)和tTLG清除率的预测模型,用于预测在CAR-T 细胞治疗后M1评估为部分缓解/疾病稳定的患者的早期进展,并在Lyon队列中进行了验证。两个最远病灶之间的距离(经体表面积标准化)与神经毒性严重程度的相关性(AUC = 0.74;P = 0.034;95% CI,0.578-0.899)在接受axicabtagene ciloleucel治疗的患者中发现了CAR-T 细胞治疗后的这种情况。在Dmax为6 cm的患者中,筛选阶段进行的RNA测序分析显示免疫抑制相关生物学过程富集,同时M2巨噬细胞、癌症相关成纤维细胞、髓源性抑制细胞和中间型耗竭T细胞增加。

总体而言,免疫抑制性肿瘤微环境可能是高肿瘤负荷患者对CAR-T 细胞治疗反应不佳的负面预后指标。

展开英文摘要原文

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has greatly improved the prognosis of relapsed and refractory patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Early identification and intervention of patients who may respond poorly to CAR-T cell therapy will help to improve the efficacy. Ninety patients from a Chinese cohort who received CAR-T cell therapy and underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) scans at the screening stage (median time to infusion 53. 5 days, range 27-176 days), 1 month and 3 months after CAR-T cell infusion were analyzed, with RNA-sequencing conducted on 47 patients at the screening stage. Patients with maximum diameter of the largest lesion (Dmax) < 6 cm (N = 60) at screening stage showed significantly higher 3-month complete response rate (85. 0% vs. 33. 3%, P < 0. 001), progression-free survival (HR 0. 17; 95% CI 0. 08-0. 35, P < 0. 001) and overall survival (HR 0. 18; 95% CI 0. 08-0. 40, P < 0. 001) than those with Dmax 6 cm (N = 30). Besides, at the screening stage, Dmax combined with extranodal involvement was more efficient in distinguishing patient outcomes.

The best cut-off values for total metabolic tumor volume (tMTV) and total lesion glycolysis (tTLG) at the screening stage were 50cm 3 and 500 g, respectively. A prediction model combining maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) at 1 month after CAR-T cell therapy (M1) and tTLG clearance rate was established to predict early progression for partial response/stable disease patients evaluated at M1 after CAR-T cell therapy and validated in Lyon cohort. Relevant association of the distance separating the two farthest lesions, standardized by body surface area to the severity of neurotoxicity (AUC = 0.

74; P = 0. 034; 95% CI, 0. 578-0. 899) after CAR-T cell therapy was found in patients received axicabtagene ciloleucel. In patients with Dmax 6 cm, RNA-sequencing analysis conducted at the screening stage showed enrichment of immunosuppressive-related biological processes, as well as increased M2 macrophages, cancer-associated fibroblasts, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and intermediate exhausted T cells.

Collectively, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment may serve as a negative prognostic indicator in patients with high tumor burden who respond poorly to CAR-T cell therapy.

论文信息

作者
Sheng LS、Shen R、Yan ZX、Wang C、Zheng X、Zhang YL、Yang HX、Wu W
第一作者单位
Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.China
通讯作者单位
Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. wl11194@rjh.com.cn.China
文献类型
读者来信
期刊
Biomarker research2024 Sep 14
原文标识
PubMed 39272132 · DOI 10.1186/s40364-024-00650-5