CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Metabolic tumor volume and the survival of patients with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy: a meta-analysis.
Metabolic tumor volume and the survival of patients with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy: a meta-analysis.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
基线高 MTV 与 CAR-T 后 NHL 患者生存期差相关。
CAR-T 细胞是治疗侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)的一种有前景的疗法。本荟萃分析旨在确定CAR-T 输注前通过正电子发射断层扫描得出的代谢肿瘤体积(MTV)与NHL患者生存之间的关联。
通过检索PubMed、Web of Science和Embase数据库自建库至2024年4月1日的相关观察性研究,获取了与本meta分析目的相关的研究。采用随机效应模型对数据进行合并,该模型考虑了研究间异质性的潜在影响。
共纳入15项观察性研究。汇总结果显示,与MTV较低者相比,CAR-T 输注前MTV较高的NHL患者与较差的无进展生存期(风险比[HR]:1.73,95%置信区间[CI]:1.48至2.02,p < 0.001;I 2 = 20%)和总生存期(HR:2.11,95% CI:1.54至2.89,p < 0.001;I 2 = 58%)相关。亚组分析显示,MTV与CAR-T 后NHL患者生存之间的关联未受研究设计、MTV截断值确定方法或分析模型(单变量或多变量,各亚组p均< 0.05)的显著影响。亚组分析提示,与既往治疗线数中位数为4的患者相比,既往治疗线数中位数为2或3的患者中MTV与不良生存结局之间的关联更强(亚组差异p < 0.05)。进一步的meta回归分析提示,MTV与生存之间的关联未受样本量、年龄、男性比例、MTV截断值、随访时间或研究质量评分的显著影响(p均> 0.05)。
Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) is a promising treatment for aggressive Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The aim of the meta-analysis was to determine the association between metabolic tumor volumes (MTV) derived on positron emission tomography before CAR-T infusion and the survival of patients with NHL.
Relevant observational studies pertaining to the purpose of the meta-analysis were obtained through a search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase from inception of the databases to April 1, 2024. The data was combined using a random-effects model that accounted for the potential influence of between-study heterogeneity.
Fifteen observational studies were included. Pooled results showed that compared to those with a lower MTV, the NHL patients with a higher MTV before CAR-T infusion were associated with a poor progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.48 to 2.02, p < 0.001; I 2 = 20%) and overall survival (HR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.54 to 2.89, p < 0.001; I 2 = 58%). Subgroup analysis showed that the association between MTV and survival of NHL patients after CAR-T was not significantly impacted by study design, methods for determination of MTV cutoff, or analytic models (univariate or multivariate, p for each subgroup all < 0.05). Subgroup analysis suggested a stronger association between MTV and poor survival outcomes in patients with median of lines of previous treatment of 2 or 3 as compared to those of 4 (p for subgroup difference < 0.05). Further meta-regression analyses suggested that the association between MTV and survival was not significantly affected by sample size, age, proportion of men, cutoff value of MTV, follow-up duration, or study quality scores (p all > 0.05).
A high MTV at baseline is associated with a poor survival of NHL patients after CAR-T. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://inplasy.com/, identifier INPLASY (INPLASY202450069).
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。