CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Integrated Germline and Somatic Features Reveal Divergent Immune Pathways Driving Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade.
Integrated Germline and Somatic Features Reveal Divergent Immune Pathways Driving Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
免疫检查点阻断(ICB)已经彻底改变了癌症治疗;然而,决定患者应答的机制仍知之甚少。在此,我们使用机器学习从胚系和体细胞生物标志物预测ICB应答,并解释所学模型以揭示驱动优越结局的推定机制。T滤泡辅助细胞浸润较高的患者即使在MHC-I类(MHC-I)存在缺陷时也有应答。进一步研究揭示了当应答依赖于MHC-I与MHC-II新抗原时,肿瘤中的ICB应答不同。尽管缓解率相似,但依赖MHC II的应答与显著更长的持久临床获益相关(发现队列:中位总生存期63.6 vs. 34.5个月;P = 0.0074;验证队列:中位总生存期37.5 vs. 33.1个月;P = 0.040)。肿瘤免疫微环境的特征反映了MHC新抗原依赖性,免疫检查点分析揭示LAG3是依赖MHC II而非依赖MHC I应答中的潜在靶点。本研究强调了可解释机器学习模型在阐明治疗应答生物学基础方面的价值。
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized cancer treatment; however, the mechanisms determining patient response remain poorly understood.
Here, we used machine learning to predict ICB response from germline and somatic biomarkers and interpreted the learned model to uncover putative mechanisms driving superior outcomes. Patients with higher infiltration of T-follicular helper cells had responses even in the presence of defects in the MHC class-I (MHC-I).
Further investigation uncovered different ICB responses in tumors when responses were reliant on MHC-I versus MHC-II neoantigens. Despite similar response rates, MHC II-reliant responses were associated with significantly longer durable clinical benefits (discovery: median overall survival of 63. 6 vs. 34.
5 months; P = 0. 0074; validation: median overall survival of 37. 5 vs. 33. 1 months; P = 0. 040). Characteristics of the tumor immune microenvironment reflected MHC neoantigen reliance, and analysis of immune checkpoints revealed LAG3 as a potential target in MHC II-reliant but not MHC I-reliant responses.
This study highlights the value of interpretable machine learning models in elucidating the biological basis of therapy responses.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。