CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in Medicare patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective claims analysis (2015-2020).
Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in Medicare patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective claims analysis (2015-2020).
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
对于复发/难治性 DLBCL 的老年患者,3 L 治疗尚无明确的标准治疗方案。DLBCL 的经济负担随着治疗线数的增加而加剧,因此凸显了对额外治疗选择的需求。
了解美国老年弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的治疗模式、医疗资源利用(HCRU)及经济负担。
这项回顾性数据库分析使用了2015年至2020年美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的Medicare按服务收费行政索赔数据,以描述年龄为66岁的DLBCL患者的特征、治疗模式、HCRU和费用。患者以DLBCL诊断时为索引日期,并要求从索引前12个月至索引后3个月连续参保。HCRU和费用(2022年美元)以每患者每月(PPPM)估计值报告。
共有11,893例患者接受了1线(L)治疗;分别有1,633例和391例接受了2 L和3 L治疗。1 L、2 L和3 L开始治疗时的中位(Q1,Q3)年龄分别为76(71,81)、77(72,82)和77(72,82)岁。1 L最常见的治疗是R-CHOP(70.9%),2 L(18.7%)和3 L(17.4%)最常见的是苯达莫司汀联合利妥昔单抗。14.8%的患者在3 L使用了CAR-T。总体而言,39.6%(1 L)、42.1%(2 L)和47.8%(3 L)的患者发生了全因住院。各线治疗期间全因平均(中位[Q1-Q3])PPPM成本分别为1 L $22,060($20,121 [$16,676-$24,597])、2 L $30,027($20,868 [$13,416-$31,016])和3 L $47,064($25,689 [$15,555-$44,149]),成本增加主要由住院费用驱动。使用和未使用CAR-T 的患者3 L全因总平均(中位[Q1-Q3])PPPM成本分别为$153,847($100,768 [$26,534-$253,630])和$28,466($23,696 [$15,466-$39,107])。
This retrospective database analysis utilized US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare fee-for-service administrative claims data from 2015 to 2020 to describe DLBCL patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HCRU, and costs among patients aged 66 years. Patients were indexed at DLBCL diagnosis and required to have continuous enrollment from 12 months pre-index until 3 months post-index. HCRU and costs (USD 2022) are reported as per-patient per-month (PPPM) estimates.
A total of 11,893 patients received 1-line (L) therapy; 1,633 and 391 received 2 L and 3 L therapies, respectively. Median (Q1, Q3) age at 1 L, 2 L, and 3 L initiation, respectively, was 76 (71, 81), 77 (72, 82), and 77 (72, 82) years. The most common therapy was R-CHOP (70.9%) for 1 L and bendamustine rituximab for 2 L (18.7%) and 3 L (17.4%). CAR T was used by 14.8% of patients in 3 L. Overall, 39.6% (1 L), 42.1% (2 L), and 47.8% (3 L) of patients had all-cause hospitalizations. All-cause mean (median [Q1-Q3]) costs PPPM during each line were $22,060 ($20,121 [$16,676-$24,597]) in 1 L, $30,027 ($20,868 [$13,416-$31,016]) in 2 L, and $47,064 ($25,689 [$15,555-$44,149]) in 3 L, with increasing costs driven primarily by inpatient expenses. Total all-cause 3 L mean (median [Q1-Q3]) costs PPPM for patients with and without CAR T were $153,847 ($100,768 [$26,534-$253,630]) and $28,466 ($23,696 [$15,466-$39,107]), respectively.
No clear standard of care exists in 3 L therapy for older adults with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. The economic burden of DLBCL intensifies with each progressing line of therapy, thus underscoring the need for additional therapeutic options.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。