← 返回

在 CAR-T 细胞治疗前或后接受 tafasitamab 联合来那度胺治疗的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的结局

英文原题:Outcome of patients with large B-cell lymphoma treated with tafasitamab plus lenalidomide either before or after CAR T-cell therapy.

查看英文原题

Outcome of patients with large B-cell lymphoma treated with tafasitamab plus lenalidomide either before or after CAR T-cell therapy.

PubMed 2024/10/22(内容时间) Blood Adv Q1 · IF 7.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

Tafasitamab联合来那度胺(TAFA-LEN)在抗CD19嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗前或后的治疗相关性存在争议。

我们分析了DESCAR-T 注册研究中接受三线axi-cel或tisa-cel治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,这些患者在CAR-T 细胞治疗前(n = 15,“TL-pre-CAR-T”组)或直接治疗后(n = 52,“TL-post-CAR-T”组)接受了TAFA-LEN治疗。

我们在TL-post-CAR-T 组中使用逆概率加权比较了TAFA-LEN与其他治疗。在TL-post-CAR-T 组中,自首次进展治疗以来的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)、总生存期(mOS)和缓解持续时间(mDOR)(mPFS2/mOS2/mDOR2)分别为3、4.7和8.1个月。TAFA-LEN后的最佳总缓解率(bORR)和最佳完全缓解率(bCRR)分别为13.5%和7.7%。在CAR-T 细胞治疗后>6个月复发的患者结局更好(mPFS2:5.6 vs 2个月,P = .0138;mOS2:未达到 vs 3.8个月,P = .0034)。

TAFA-LEN与其他治疗之间的bORR和bCRR分别为20.6% vs 24.9%和11.6% vs 15.6%。TAFA-LEN与其他治疗之间的结局相似(mPFS2:2.9 vs 2.4个月,P = .91;mOS2:3.3 vs 5.5个月,P = .06)。在TL-pre-CAR-T 组的探索性分析中,CAR-T 前的中位TAFA-LEN治疗持续时间为3.7个月,无患者变为CD19阴性。CAR-T 细胞输注后的bORR、bCRR、6个月PFS和OS率分别为45.5%、36.4%、20.1%和58.2%。无论是TAFA-LEN还是对比性挽救治疗均未改善CAR-T 细胞治疗后复发患者的结局。

展开英文摘要原文

Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide (TAFA-LEN) treatment relevance pre- or post-anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is debated.

We analyzed patients with large B-cell lymphoma in the DESCAR-T registry treated with axi[1]cel or tisa-cel in 3rd line and TAFA-LEN before (n = 15, "TL-pre-CAR-T" set) or directly after (n = 52, "TL-post-CAR-T" set) CAR T-cell therapy.

We compared TAFA-LEN v. other treatments using inverse probability weighting in the TL-post-CAR[1]T set. In the TL-post-CAR-T set, the median progression-free survival (mPFS), overall survival (mOS), and duration of response (mDOR) since the first treatment for progression (mPFS2/mOS2/mDOR2) were 3, 4. 7, and 8. 1 months, respectively. The best overall response rate (bORR) and best complete response rate (bCRR) after TAFA-LEN were 13. 5% and 7. 7%, respectively. Outcomes were better for patients who relapsed >6 months after CAR T-cell therapy (mPFS2: 5. 6 vs 2 months, P = . 0138; mOS2: not reached vs 3. 8 months, P = . 0034).

The bORR and bCRR between TAFA-LEN and other treatments were 20. 6% vs 24. 9% and 11. 6% vs 15. 6%, respectively. Outcomes were similar between TAFA-LEN and other treatments (mPFS2: 2. 9 vs 2. 4 months, P = . 91; mOS2: 3. 3 vs 5. 5 months, P = . 06). In an exploratory analysis of the TL-pre-CAR-T set, the median TAFA-LEN treatment duration before CAR-T was 3.

7 months with no patient becoming CD19 negative. The bORR, bCRR, 6- month PFS, and OS rates after CAR T-cell infusion were 45. 5%, 36. 4%, 20. 1%, and 58. 2%, respectively. Neither TAFA-LEN nor comparative salvage treatment improved outcomes for patients relapsing after CAR T-cell therapy.

论文信息

作者
Camus V、Houot R、Brisou G、Tessoulin B、Bailly S、Sesques P、Decroocq J、Krzisch D
单位
Department of Hematology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.France
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Blood advances2024 Oct 22
原文标识
PubMed 39163620 · DOI 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013726