CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Impact of prior inotuzumab ozogamicin treatment on brexucabtagene autoleucel outcomes in adults with B-cell ALL.
Impact of prior inotuzumab ozogamicin treatment on brexucabtagene autoleucel outcomes in adults with B-cell ALL.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
既往 inotuzumab ozogamicin(InO)治疗对 brexucabtagene autoleucel(brexu-cel)结局的影响在成人急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)中仍不明确。
我们开展了一项回顾性多中心分析,纳入189例接受brexu-cel治疗的复发/难治性ALL患者。超过半数患者在brexu-cel前接受过InO(InO暴露)。InO暴露患者既往治疗更重(P = .02),且在单采前更常存在活动性骨髓病变(P = .03)。InO暴露与InO初治患者接受brexu-cel后的缓解率和毒性特征相当;然而,InO初治患者在brexu-cel缓解后接受巩固治疗的比例更高(P = .005)。中位随访11.4个月,在单变量分析中,InO暴露患者的无进展生存期(PFS;P = .013)和总生存期(OS;P = .006)较差;然而,在多变量模型中,既往InO暴露并未影响PFS(风险比,1.20;95%置信区间,0.71-2.03)。在InO暴露患者中,InO应答者相较InO难治患者具有更优的PFS(P = .002)和OS(P < .0001)。给予InO的时机未影响brexu-cel结局,接受InO作为桥接治疗或单采前治疗的患者PFS(P = .51)和OS(P = .86)相当。
总之,尽管在未校正分析中InO暴露与brexu-cel后较差的生存结局相关,但这些关联在多变量分析中不再显著,提示InO不太可能对brexu-cel疗效产生负面影响。
我们的数据反而表明,接受brexu-cel的InO暴露受者往往为具有内在不良白血病生物学特征的高危患者。
The effect of prior inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) treatment on brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) outcomes remains unclear in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of 189 patients with relapsed/refractory ALL treated with brexu-cel. Over half of the patients received InO before brexu-cel (InO exposed). InO-exposed patients were more heavily pretreated (P = . 02) and frequently had active marrow disease before apheresis (P = . 03). Response rate and toxicity profile after brexu-cel were comparable for InO-exposed and InO-naïve patients; however, consolidation therapy after brexu-cel response was used at a higher rate in InO-naïve patients (P = . 005). With a median follow-up of 11.
4 months, InO-exposed patients had inferior progression-free survival (PFS; P = . 013) and overall survival (OS; P = . 006) in univariate analyses; however, prior InO exposure did not influence PFS (hazard ratio, 1. 20; 95% confidence interval, 0. 71-2. 03) in multivariate models.
Within InO-exposed patients, InO responders had superior PFS (P = . 002) and OS (P < . 0001) relative to InO-refractory patients. The timing of administering InO did not affect brexu-cel outcomes, with comparable PFS (P = . 51) and OS (P = . 86) for patients receiving InO as bridging therapy or before apheresis.
In conclusion, although InO exposure was associated with inferior survival outcomes after brexu-cel in unadjusted analyses, these associations were no longer significant in multivariate analyses, suggesting it is unlikely that InO negatively affects brexu-cel efficacy.
Our data instead imply that InO-exposed recipients of brexu-cel tend to be higher-risk patients with intrinsic adverse leukemia biology.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。