CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Medicare Utilization and Cost Trends for CAR T Cell Therapies Across Settings of Care in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
Medicare Utilization and Cost Trends for CAR T Cell Therapies Across Settings of Care in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
用于治疗 LBCL 的 CAR-T 疗法在 Medicare 人群中已越来越常见,且主要见于住院场景。
分析Medicare FFS理赔数据,重点考察三种获批治疗DLBCL的CAR-T 产品:lisocabtagene maraleucel(liso-cel)、tisagenlecleucel(tisa-cel)及axicabtagene autoleucel(axi-cel)的使用模式。分析覆盖2021至2022年CAR-T 治疗前180天及治疗后90天,评估治疗前后医疗服务利用、医疗支出和合并症。排除临床试验及免除前瞻性支付系统(PPS)的中心理赔。住院和门诊队列比较连续变量采用Wilcoxon秩和检验,分类变量采用卡方或Fisher精确检验。
评估的391笔CAR-T 理赔中,79%在住院环境实施,21%在门诊实施。住院CAR-T 医院平均Medicare支付额为498,723美元(276,138至1,066,524美元),门诊理赔平均为414,393美元(276,980至849,878美元)。门诊CAR-T 医院治疗后3个月平均费用较高(15,794美元比10,244美元)。尽管治疗后费用较高,将CAR-T 治疗及前后期合并为单一照护事件后,门诊CAR-T 受益人总费用较低(原文报告587,908美元比529,188美元)。治疗后30天内再次住院率方面,住院CAR-T 患者显著低于门诊患者(21%比59%)。门诊CAR-T 患者从初次CAR-T 出院到住院的间隔也显著短于住院CAR-T 患者(8.0天比14.1天,p<0.0001)。住院CAR-T 患者该次住院平均住院日更长(6.9天比6.2天)。
LBCL CAR-T 疗法在Medicare人群中越来越常见,主要在住院环境实施。本研究有助于了解医疗服务提供者的成本及CAR-T 给药相关患者照护;医院平均支付费用涵盖CAR-T 药物和提供的医疗服务。
We analyzed Medicare FFS claims data, focusing on the utilization patterns across three CAR T products-lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and axicabtagene autoleucel (axi-cel)-which are indicated for the treatment of DLBCL. Our investigation covered the period from 2021 through 2022. This analysis spanned a 180-day period prior to CAR T procedure and extended to a 90-day post-CAR T. Utilization of healthcare services, healthcare spending, and comorbidities were assessed in the pre- and post-periods. Clinical trial and PPS-exempt center claims were removed from the analysis. Statistical comparisons between inpatient and outpatient cohorts were made using Wilcoxon's rank-sum tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables.
Among the total 391 CAR T claims assessed, most of the CAR T therapies were administered in the inpatient setting (79%) compared to outpatient (21%). CAR T therapy in the inpatient setting received an average Medicare cost of US$498,723 ($276,138-$1,066,524), while the average Medicare cost for outpatient CAR T claims was $414,393 ($276,980-$849,878). There was a higher 3-month average post-period cost for those hospitals utilizing CAR T in the outpatient setting than the inpatient setting ($15,794 vs. $10,244). Despite the higher post-period cost, when looking at the CAR T procedure and pre- and post-periods as a single episode, beneficiaries receiving outpatient CAR T had less cost for the total episode of care ($587,908 vs. $529,188). Follow-up inpatient claims were also assessed post-CAR T procedure for 30 days. The rate of post-CAR T inpatient re-admission was significantly lower for beneficiaries receiving the index CAR T in the inpatient setting (21%) compared to outpatient CAR T (59%). Days between index CAR T discharge and IP admission were also significantly shorter for OP CAR T compared to IP CAR T (8.0 vs. 14.1 days, p < 0.0001). Additionally, IP CAR T had a longer ALOS on the admission claim (6.9 vs. 6.2 days).
CAR T therapy for the treatment of LBCL has become more common within the Medicare population, primarily in the inpatient setting. This study helps understand providers' cost and associated patient care around CAR T administration. The data show that the average cost received by hospitals encompasses the expenses related to both the CAR T drug and the medical services delivered to patients.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。