不适合移植的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤二线使用 axicabtagene ciloleucel:ALYCANTE 最终分析
Second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for transplantation: ALYCANTE final analysis.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel to Mosunetuzumab for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma.
Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel to Mosunetuzumab for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
Axicabtagene ciloleucel(axi-cel)是首个获批用于复发/难治性(R/R)滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)患者的嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法,而mosunetuzumab是首个在该人群中获批的双特异性单克隆抗体。在缺乏头对头证据的情况下,本研究旨在进行匹配调整间接比较(MAIC),以评估这两种治疗在三线或更后线(3L+)FL中的比较疗效和安全性。证据基础包括单臂axi-cel试验ZUMA-5(NCT03105336)中所有入组患者(无论是否输注)的个体患者数据(IPD),以及通过系统综述从出版物中识别的mosunetuzumab FL试验(NCT02500407)的聚合数据。疗效结局为无进展生存期(PFS)、缓解持续时间(DoR)、客观缓解率(ORR)、完全缓解率(CRR)。在可能的情况下,两项试验的分析均采用独立中心审查。安全性结局为细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)、神经系统事件(NE)和治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)。进行了非锚定MAIC,以将ZUMA-5与mosunetuzumab试验的患者特征对齐。
对于每个结局,预后因素通过定量分析和临床专家预先确定。对于至事件发生时间结局,使用Cox回归估计风险比(HRs),使用来自ZUMA-5的IPD和从mosunetuzumab的Kaplan-Meier曲线中提取的伪IPD。两项试验之间的患者特征对齐良好,匹配后产生了较大的有效样本量,ZUMA-5(n = 127)的范围为93.4至115.5。与mosunetuzumab(n = 90)相比,axi-cel与改善的PFS相关(HR:0.39;95%置信区间[CI]:0.24-0.62)和DoR(HR:0.45;95%CI:0.27-0.76)。同样,axi-cel带来了更高的ORR(OR:3.87;95%CI:1.53-9.76)和CRR(OR:2.80;95%CI:1.50-5.26)。尽管axi-cel与更高的全级别CRS发生率(OR:5.54;95%CI:2.63-8.94)和NEs发生率(OR:3.54;95%CI:1.28-9.83)相关,但3级CRS和TRAEs的差异无统计学意义。
本研究结果表明,与mosunetuzumab相比,axi-cel治疗3L+ R/R FL具有更优的疗效和更持久的缓解,同时全级别CRS和NE的几率增加,但G3+ CRS和TRAEs的几率未增加。
Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) was the first chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) patients, while mosunetuzumab was the first bispecific monoclonal antibody approved in this population. In the absence of head-to-head evidence, this study sought to conduct a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) to estimate the comparative efficacy and safety of these treatments in 3rd line or higher (3L+) FL. The evidence base consisted of individual patient data (IPD) of all enrolled patients, regardless of infusion status, from the single-arm axi-cel trial, ZUMA-5 (NCT03105336), and aggregate data from the mosunetuzumab FL trial (NCT02500407) from publications identified through a systematic review. Efficacy outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), objective response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR). Analyses used independent central review for both trials, where possible. Safety outcomes were cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurological events (NE), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Unanchored MAICs were conducted to align ZUMA-5 to the patient characteristics of the mosunetuzumab trial.
For each outcome, prognostic factors were identified a priori through quantitative analysis and clinical experts. For time-to-event outcomes, hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox regression using IPD from ZUMA-5 and pseudo-IPD extracted from Kaplan-Meier plots for mosunetuzumab. Patient characteristics were well-aligned between trials leading to large effective-sample sizes after matching, ranging from 93. 4 to 115. 5, for ZUMA-5 (n = 127). In comparisons to mosunetuzumab (n = 90), axi-cel was associated with improved PFS (HR: 0. 39; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0. 24-0.
62) and DoR (HR: 0. 45; 95% CI: 0. 27-0. 76). Similarly, axi-cel led to higher ORR (OR: 3. 87; 95% CI: 1. 53-9. 76) and CRR (OR: 2. 80; 95% CI: 1. 50-5. 26). Although axi-cel was associated with a higher rate of all-grade CRS (OR: 5. 54; 95% CI: 2. 63-8. 94) and NEs (OR: 3. 54; 95% CI: 1. 28-9.
83), differences in grade 3 CRS and TRAEs were not statistically significant. Findings from this study show improved efficacy and more durable response for the treatment of 3L+ R/R FL with axi-cel relative to mosunetuzumab, with increased odds of all-grade CRS and NE, but not G3+ CRS and TRAEs.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。