← 返回

商业化 relmacabtagene autoleucel(relma-cel)治疗复发/难治性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的真实世界经验:中国患者的多中心回顾性分析

英文原题:Real-world experience of commercial relmacabtagene autoleucel (relma-cel) for relapsed/refractory central nervous system lymphoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients in China.

查看英文原题

Real-world experience of commercial relmacabtagene autoleucel (relma-cel) for relapsed/refractory central nervous system lymphoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients in China.

PubMed 2024/05/27(内容时间) J Immunother Cancer Q1 · IF 11.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

本研究是首个也是规模最大的、针对商业化 relma-cel 治疗 R/R CNSL 的真实世界研究,显示出令人期待的疗效和可接受的安全性。

中文摘要

复发/难治性(R/R)中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(CNSL)预后不良。Relmacabtagene autoleucel(relma-cel)在中国采用优化且适于商业化的工艺开发,其嵌合抗原受体(CAR)与 lisocabtagene maraleucel 相同;该疗法在关键性 RELIANCE 研究中显示出显著疗效且安全性可控。然而,目前尚无 relma-cel 商业化应用的真实世界数据,尤其缺乏涉及 CNS 受累患者的数据。

对 12 家临床中心使用商业化 relma-cel 治疗 R/R CNSL 患者的情况进行回顾性分析。主要终点为评估治疗 3 个月时达到完全缓解(CR)的患者比例。次要终点包括最佳完全缓解(BCR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、缓解持续时间(DOR)、总生存期(OS)及不良事件发生率。

22 例 CNSL 患者中包括 12 例原发性 CNSL 和 10 例继发性 CNSL;最佳总缓解率为 90.9%,BCR 率为 68.2%。中位随访 316 天(范围 55–618 天)时,估算的 1 年 PFS、DOR 和 OS 率分别为 64.4%、71.5% 和 79.2%。在最近一次单采前治疗中达到持久 CR 或部分缓解,并将 relma-cel 作为巩固治疗的患者(n=8)获得显著临床获益,其 1 年 PFS 率为 100.0%,而其他患者为 41.7%(p=0.02)。此外,就主要终点而言,输注后 3 个月未达 CR 似乎可预测较差预后;相应估算的 1 年 PFS 分别为 83.3% 和 37.0%(p=0.03)。72.9% 的患者发生 CRS(3 级:4.5%),36.4% 的患者发生免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(3 级:4.5%)。在持续使用 BTK 抑制剂(BTKi)的基础上加用 PD-1 抑制剂替雷利珠单抗后,中位 2 周(范围 12–32 天)通过定量 PCR 或流式细胞术检测到 CAR-T 细胞显著再扩增。

这是首项也是最大规模的商业化 relma-cel 治疗 R/R CNSL 真实世界研究,显示出有前景的疗效和可接受的安全性。研究再次证实 BTKi 或 PD-1 抑制剂等免疫药物有助于 CAR-T 细胞再扩增,并提出联合双药与 CAR-T 的治疗设想,仍需进一步验证。最重要的是,研究强调对挽救治疗敏感的患者应更早采用 CAR-T 细胞巩固治疗,为未来策略提供依据和启发。

展开英文摘要原文

Relapsed/refractory (R/R) central nervous system lymphomas (CNSLs) are associated with a poor prognosis. Relmacabtagene autoleucel (relma-cel), expressing the same chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) as lisocabtagene maraleucel, with an optimized commercial-ready process developed in China, demonstrated remarkable efficacy and manageable safety in the pivotal RELIANCE study. However, no published data are available on the "real-world" use of relma-cel, especially for patients with CNS involvement.

Retrospective analyses were conducted for commercial relma-cel used in patients with R/R CNSL at 12 clinics. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the proportion of patients who achieved complete response (CR) at 3 months. Secondary endpoints included best complete response (BCR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and the incidence of adverse events.

Among the 22 CNSL patients (12 primary CNSLs; 10 secondary CNSLs), the best overall response rate was 90.9% and the BCR rate was 68.2%. With median follow-up of 316 days (range, 55-618 days), the estimated 1-year PFS rate, DOR, and OS rate were 64.4%, 71.5%, and 79.2%, respectively. Significant clinical benefits were observed in patients who were in durable CR or partial response to the most recent prior therapy preleukapheresis and received relma-cel as consolidation therapy (n=8), with 1-year PFS rate of 100.0% versus 41.7% (p=0.02). In addition, in terms of primary endpoint, non-CR at 3 months postinfusion seemed to be predictive of a worse prognosis, with an estimated 1-year PFS of 83.3% versus 37.0% (p=0.03), respectively. CRS occurred in 72.9% of patients (grade 3: 4.5%) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome in 36.4% of patients (grade 3: 4.5%). With the add-on agent PD-1 inhibitor (tislelizumab) to the ongoing BTKi, significant re-expansions of CAR T-cell were detected by quantitative PCR or flow cytometry after a median of 2 weeks (range, 12-32 days).

This study was the first and largest real-world study of commercial relma-cel for R/R CNSL, demonstrating promising efficacy and acceptable safety. We reaffirmed the benefit of immuno-agents such as BTKi or PD-1 inhibitor on CAR T-cell re-expansion and hypothesized a dual-agent CAR-T related combinatorial therapies, which warrants further validation. Most importantly, we highlighted the earlier use of CAR T-cell therapy as a consolidative therapy for patients sensitive to salvage therapy, which provided an impetus and inspired-future strategy.

论文信息

作者
Yu W、Huang L、Mei H、Li Y、Niu T、Zou D、Liu Y、Zhang H
第一作者单位
Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.China
通讯作者单位
Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China jianqinmi@shsmu.edu.cn.China
文献类型
多中心研究
期刊
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer2024 May 27
原文标识
PubMed 38802271 · DOI 10.1136/jitc-2023-008553