不适合移植的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤二线使用 axicabtagene ciloleucel:ALYCANTE 最终分析
Second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for transplantation: ALYCANTE final analysis.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Cost-Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma in the United States.
Cost-Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma in the United States.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
鉴于模型结果和敏感性分析的稳健性,axi-cel 有望成为 3L+ 复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤中具有成本效益的治疗。
近期单臂试验 ZUMA-5 的结果显示,阿基仑赛(axi-cel)治疗复发/难治性(r/r)滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)可获得较高的持久缓解率,且毒性可耐受。本研究从美国第三方支付方角度建立成本效果模型,评估 axi-cel 与标准治疗(SOC)相比,在既往至少接受两线全身治疗(3L+)的 r/r FL 患者中的价值。
建立具有终身时间范围的三状态分区生存成本效果模型。采用 ZUMA-5(axi-cel)和 SCHOLAR-5(SOC)研究的 36 个月患者级数据外推无进展生存期和总生存期。根据文献,假设模型人群中生存超过 5 年者有 40% 可达到长期缓解。结果以增量成本效果比(ICER,即每增加一个质量调整生命年〔QALY〕所需的增量成本)表示,并进行单因素敏感性分析、概率敏感性分析和情景分析。所有结局按每年 3% 折现。
与 SOC 相比,axi-cel 增加 4.28 个生命年和 3.64 个 QALY,总成本增加 321,192 美元,ICER 为每 QALY 88,300 美元。单因素敏感性分析中,ICER 在 67,277 至 133,030 美元之间变化。在以 150,000 美元为支付意愿阈值的 5,000 次模拟中,概率敏感性分析显示 axi-cel 具有 99% 的成本效果概率。
模型结果及敏感性分析均较稳健,预计 axi-cel 是 3L+ r/r FL 的一种具有成本效果的治疗。
The results of a recent single-arm trial (ZUMA-5) of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) for relapsed/refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) demonstrated high rates of durable response and tolerable toxicity among treated patients. To quantify the value of axi-cel compared with standard of care (SOC) to manage r/r FL patients who have had at least 2 prior lines of systemic therapy (3L+), a cost-effectiveness model was developed from a US third-party payer perspective.
A 3-state partitioned-survival cost-effectiveness model was developed with a lifetime horizon. Patient-level analyses of the 36-month ZUMA-5 (axi-cel) and SCHOLAR-5 (SOC) studies were used to extrapolate progression-free and overall survivals. After 5 years of survival, an estimated 40% of the modeled population was assumed to experience long-term remission based on literature. Results include the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) measured as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. One-way sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and scenario analyses were performed. All outcomes were discounted 3% per year.
Axi-cel led to an increase of 4.28 life-years, 3.64 QALYs, and a total cost increase of $321 192 relative to SOC, resulting in an ICER of $88 300 per QALY. Across all parameters varied in the one-way sensitivity analysis, the ICER varied between $133 030 and $67 277. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, axi-cel had a 99% probability of being cost-effective across 5000 iterations using a $150 000 willingness-to-pay threshold.
Given the robustness of the model results and sensitivity analyses, axi-cel is expected to be a cost-effective treatment in 3L+ r/r FL.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。