← 返回

阿基仑赛用于美国复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤成人患者的成本效果

英文原题:Cost-Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma in the United States.

查看英文原题

Cost-Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma in the United States.

PubMed 2024/04/17(内容时间) Value Health Q1 · IF 6.2(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

鉴于模型结果和敏感性分析的稳健性,axi-cel 有望成为 3L+ 复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤中具有成本效益的治疗。

中文摘要

近期单臂试验 ZUMA-5 的结果显示,阿基仑赛(axi-cel)治疗复发/难治性(r/r)滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)可获得较高的持久缓解率,且毒性可耐受。本研究从美国第三方支付方角度建立成本效果模型,评估 axi-cel 与标准治疗(SOC)相比,在既往至少接受两线全身治疗(3L+)的 r/r FL 患者中的价值。

建立具有终身时间范围的三状态分区生存成本效果模型。采用 ZUMA-5(axi-cel)和 SCHOLAR-5(SOC)研究的 36 个月患者级数据外推无进展生存期和总生存期。根据文献,假设模型人群中生存超过 5 年者有 40% 可达到长期缓解。结果以增量成本效果比(ICER,即每增加一个质量调整生命年〔QALY〕所需的增量成本)表示,并进行单因素敏感性分析、概率敏感性分析和情景分析。所有结局按每年 3% 折现。

与 SOC 相比,axi-cel 增加 4.28 个生命年和 3.64 个 QALY,总成本增加 321,192 美元,ICER 为每 QALY 88,300 美元。单因素敏感性分析中,ICER 在 67,277 至 133,030 美元之间变化。在以 150,000 美元为支付意愿阈值的 5,000 次模拟中,概率敏感性分析显示 axi-cel 具有 99% 的成本效果概率。

模型结果及敏感性分析均较稳健,预计 axi-cel 是 3L+ r/r FL 的一种具有成本效果的治疗。

展开英文摘要原文

The results of a recent single-arm trial (ZUMA-5) of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) for relapsed/refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) demonstrated high rates of durable response and tolerable toxicity among treated patients. To quantify the value of axi-cel compared with standard of care (SOC) to manage r/r FL patients who have had at least 2 prior lines of systemic therapy (3L+), a cost-effectiveness model was developed from a US third-party payer perspective.

A 3-state partitioned-survival cost-effectiveness model was developed with a lifetime horizon. Patient-level analyses of the 36-month ZUMA-5 (axi-cel) and SCHOLAR-5 (SOC) studies were used to extrapolate progression-free and overall survivals. After 5 years of survival, an estimated 40% of the modeled population was assumed to experience long-term remission based on literature. Results include the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) measured as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. One-way sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and scenario analyses were performed. All outcomes were discounted 3% per year.

Axi-cel led to an increase of 4.28 life-years, 3.64 QALYs, and a total cost increase of $321 192 relative to SOC, resulting in an ICER of $88 300 per QALY. Across all parameters varied in the one-way sensitivity analysis, the ICER varied between $133 030 and $67 277. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, axi-cel had a 99% probability of being cost-effective across 5000 iterations using a $150 000 willingness-to-pay threshold.

Given the robustness of the model results and sensitivity analyses, axi-cel is expected to be a cost-effective treatment in 3L+ r/r FL.

论文信息

作者
Oluwole OO、Ray MD、Rosettie KL、Ball G、Jacob J、Bilir SP、Patel AR、Jacobson CA
单位
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: olalekan.oluwole@vumc.org.United States
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2024 Aug
原文标识
PubMed 38641058 · DOI 10.1016/j.jval.2024.04.003