← 返回

按治疗线数划分的弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的真实世界患者特征、治疗模式和治疗结局

英文原题:Real-world patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and treatment outcomes of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by line of therapy.

查看英文原题

Real-world patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and treatment outcomes of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by line of therapy.

PubMed 2024/04/01(内容时间) Cancer Med Q2 · IF 3.5(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

在这项真实世界分析中,25.2% 的患者在一线治疗后出现 R/R-DLBCL,结局不佳。

中文摘要

弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)初始采用利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松(R-CHOP)治疗通常有效,但多达50%的患者会发生难治或复发(R/R)疾病。本研究旨在提供R/R-DLBCL患者特征、治疗模式和结局的当代数据。

从COTA真实世界数据库中识别2016年1月至2021年3月确诊、年龄≥18岁且开始一线(1L)治疗的DLBCL患者。评估整个研究人群及不同治疗线(LOT)的基线特征、治疗模式和真实世界结局,包括至下一次治疗时间(rwTTNT)和真实世界总生存期(rwOS)。

共识别1,347例符合条件的DLBCL患者。其中340例(25.2%)进入二线(2L),其中141例(41.5%)继续接受三线(3L),其中51例(36.2%)继续接受四线及以上(4L+)治疗。最常见治疗分别为1L R-CHOP(63.6%)、2L干细胞移植(SCT,17.9%)、3L polatuzumab vedotin联合苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗(Pola-BR,9.9%),以及4LCAR-T(CAR-T)细胞治疗(11.8%)。治疗线数越后,治疗模式越多样。自1L开始治疗后1年和3年rwOS分别为88.5%和78.4%。接受更后线治疗的患者1年和3年rwOS数值更低;从2L开始计算分别为62.4%和46.4%。

这项真实世界分析中,25.2%的患者在1L后出现R/R-DLBCL,且结局较差。研究结果显示,R/R-DLBCL患者仍高度缺乏新型、安全、有效的治疗选择。

展开英文摘要原文

Although initial treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) can be effective, up to 50% of patients will develop refractory or relapsed (R/R) disease. This study aimed to provide contemporary data on characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes for R/R-DLBCL.

Patients with incident (January 2016 to March 2021) DLBCL age 18 years who initiated first-line (1L) therapy were identified from the COTA real-world database. Baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and real-world outcomes, including time to next treatment (rwTTNT) and overall survival (rwOS), were assessed for the study population and by line of therapy (LOT).

A total of 1347 eligible DLBCL patients were identified. Of these, 340 (25.2%) proceeded to receive 2L, of whom 141 (41.5%) proceeded to receive 3L, of whom 51 (36.2%) proceeded to receive 4L+. Most common treatments were R-CHOP in 1L (63.6%), stem cell transplant (SCT) in 2L (17.9%), polatuzumab vedotin, bendamustine, and rituximab (Pola-BR) in 3L (9.9%), and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) in 4L (11.8%). Treatment patterns were more variable in later LOTs. One- and 3-year rwOS from 1L initiation were 88.5% and 78.4%, respectively. Patients who received later LOTs experienced numerically lower 1- and 3-year rwOS (from 2L initiation: 62.4% and 46.4%, respectively).

In this real-world analysis, 25.2% of patients experienced R/R-DLBCL after 1L with poor outcomes. Given the findings of this study, there is a high unmet need for novel, safe, and effective treatment options for patients with R/R DLBCL.

论文信息

作者
Sineshaw HM、Zettler CM、Prescott J、Garg M、Chakraborty S、Sarpong EM、Bai C、Belli AJ
第一作者单位
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA.United States
通讯作者单位
COTA, Inc., New York, New York, USA.United States
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Cancer medicine2024 Apr
原文标识
PubMed 38597118 · DOI 10.1002/cam4.7173