CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Real-world patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and treatment outcomes of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by line of therapy.
Real-world patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and treatment outcomes of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by line of therapy.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
在这项真实世界分析中,25.2% 的患者在一线治疗后出现 R/R-DLBCL,结局不佳。
弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)初始采用利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松(R-CHOP)治疗通常有效,但多达50%的患者会发生难治或复发(R/R)疾病。本研究旨在提供R/R-DLBCL患者特征、治疗模式和结局的当代数据。
从COTA真实世界数据库中识别2016年1月至2021年3月确诊、年龄≥18岁且开始一线(1L)治疗的DLBCL患者。评估整个研究人群及不同治疗线(LOT)的基线特征、治疗模式和真实世界结局,包括至下一次治疗时间(rwTTNT)和真实世界总生存期(rwOS)。
共识别1,347例符合条件的DLBCL患者。其中340例(25.2%)进入二线(2L),其中141例(41.5%)继续接受三线(3L),其中51例(36.2%)继续接受四线及以上(4L+)治疗。最常见治疗分别为1L R-CHOP(63.6%)、2L干细胞移植(SCT,17.9%)、3L polatuzumab vedotin联合苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗(Pola-BR,9.9%),以及4LCAR-T(CAR-T)细胞治疗(11.8%)。治疗线数越后,治疗模式越多样。自1L开始治疗后1年和3年rwOS分别为88.5%和78.4%。接受更后线治疗的患者1年和3年rwOS数值更低;从2L开始计算分别为62.4%和46.4%。
这项真实世界分析中,25.2%的患者在1L后出现R/R-DLBCL,且结局较差。研究结果显示,R/R-DLBCL患者仍高度缺乏新型、安全、有效的治疗选择。
Although initial treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) can be effective, up to 50% of patients will develop refractory or relapsed (R/R) disease. This study aimed to provide contemporary data on characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes for R/R-DLBCL.
Patients with incident (January 2016 to March 2021) DLBCL age 18 years who initiated first-line (1L) therapy were identified from the COTA real-world database. Baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and real-world outcomes, including time to next treatment (rwTTNT) and overall survival (rwOS), were assessed for the study population and by line of therapy (LOT).
A total of 1347 eligible DLBCL patients were identified. Of these, 340 (25.2%) proceeded to receive 2L, of whom 141 (41.5%) proceeded to receive 3L, of whom 51 (36.2%) proceeded to receive 4L+. Most common treatments were R-CHOP in 1L (63.6%), stem cell transplant (SCT) in 2L (17.9%), polatuzumab vedotin, bendamustine, and rituximab (Pola-BR) in 3L (9.9%), and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) in 4L (11.8%). Treatment patterns were more variable in later LOTs. One- and 3-year rwOS from 1L initiation were 88.5% and 78.4%, respectively. Patients who received later LOTs experienced numerically lower 1- and 3-year rwOS (from 2L initiation: 62.4% and 46.4%, respectively).
In this real-world analysis, 25.2% of patients experienced R/R-DLBCL after 1L with poor outcomes. Given the findings of this study, there is a high unmet need for novel, safe, and effective treatment options for patients with R/R DLBCL.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。