← 返回

TRANSFORM 研究主要分析结果通俗语言摘要:liso-cell 作为大 B 细胞淋巴瘤首个治疗方案失败后的第二种治疗方案

英文原题:Plain language summary of the TRANSFORM study primary analysis results: liso-cell as a second treatment regimen for large B-cell lymphoma following failure of the first treatment regimen.

查看英文原题

Plain language summary of the TRANSFORM study primary analysis results: liso-cell as a second treatment regimen for large B-cell lymphoma following failure of the first treatment regimen.

PubMed 2024/03/28(内容时间) Future Oncol Q2 · IF 3.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

本摘要介绍什么?大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者在接受一线治疗并产生应答后的第一年内,可能出现疾病复发,即早期复发;另一些患者为原发难治,即疾病对一线治疗完全无应答,或仅短暂应答。二线治疗包括免疫治疗,随后给予大剂量化疗和自体造血干细胞移植(ASCT),有望治愈LBCL。

然而,若疾病对免疫治疗无应答,患者便无法接受ASCT,最终治愈率不足30%。因此亟需新的二线治疗选择,例如CAR-T 细胞治疗,即使用患者自身经基因工程改造的淋巴细胞(也称T细胞)对抗淋巴瘤。本文总结了III期TRANSFORM临床研究的关键结果。

该研究评估CAR-T 治疗liso-cel能否安全、有效地作为早期复发或原发难治LBCL患者的二线治疗。研究将184例适合接受ASCT的复发/难治性LBCL成人随机分配至liso-cel组或标准治疗(SOC)组。SOC包括免疫化疗,随后进行大剂量化疗和ASCT。主要发现是什么?几乎所有liso-cel组患者(97%)完成了治疗,而SOC组有53%未能完成治疗,主要原因是疾病无应答或复发,因此无法接受ASCT。与接受SOC二线治疗者相比,接受liso-cel二线治疗者在发生不良医学事件或疾病恶化前生存时间更长,且治疗应答更好。研究者认为,liso-cel相关副作用可管理,且属于已知CAR-T 治疗副作用。研究者得出什么主要结论?TRANSFORM研究结果支持将liso-cel作为比SOC更有效且对复发/难治性LBCL患者安全的二线治疗。临床试验注册号:NCT03575351(TRANSFORM研究;ClinicalTrials.gov)。

展开英文摘要原文

What is this summary about? People diagnosed with a disease called large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) may experience return, or early relapse, of their disease within the first year after receiving and responding to their first (first-line) treatment regimen. Others may have primary refractory disease, meaning that the disease either did not respond to first-line treatment at all or only responded for a very brief period. Second (second-line) treatment includes immunotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT, which has the potential to cure LBCL.

However, if the disease does not respond to immunotherapy, people cannot receive ASCT, and less than 30% of people are cured.

Therefore, new second-line treatment options are required, such as CAR T cell therapy, which uses a person's own genetically engineered lymphocytes, also called T cells, to fight their lymphoma. In this article, we summarize the key results of the phase 3 TRANSFORM clinical study that tested if liso-cel, a CAR T cell treatment, can safely and effectively be used as a second-line treatment for people with early relapsed or primary refractory (relapsed/refractory) LBCL. A total of 184 adults with relapsed/refractory LBCL who were able to receive ASCT were randomly treated with either liso-cel or standard of care (SOC) as second-line treatment. SOC included immunochemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. What were the key takeaways?

Almost all (97%) people in the liso-cel group completed treatment, whereas 53% of people in the SOC group did not complete treatment, mostly due to their disease not responding or relapsing, and therefore they were not able to receive ASCT. People who received liso-cel as a second-line treatment lived longer without the occurrence of an unfavorable medical event or worsening of the disease and had a better response to treatment than those who received SOC as second-line treatment.

People who received liso-cel reported side effects that researchers considered to be manageable, and that were known to occur with CAR T cell treatment. What were the main conclusions reported by the researchers? Results from the TRANSFORM study support the use of liso-cel as a more effective second-line treatment compared with SOC that is safe for people with relapsed/refractory LBCL. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03575351 (TRANSFORM study) (ClinicalTrials. gov).

论文信息

作者
Abramson JS、Solomon SR、Arnason J、Johnston PB、Glass B、Bachanova V、Ibrahimi S、Mielke S
第一作者单位
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.United States
通讯作者单位
Division of Hematology, Hematologic Malignancies & Stem Cell Transplantation, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA.United States
文献类型
患者教育材料
期刊
Future oncology (London, England)2024
原文标识
PubMed 38547003 · DOI 10.2217/fon-2023-0898