CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Sustained efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in central nervous system lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual data.
Sustained efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in central nervous system lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual data.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(CNSL)被认为是一种侵袭性淋巴瘤,预后较差。针对 CNSL 的研究表明,嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞疗法在有限样本量中显示出有效应答。因此,我们开展了这项系统评价和 meta 分析,以阐明 CAR-T 细胞疗法治疗 CNSL 的持续疗效及与持续疗效相关的因素。
我们检索了截至 2023 年 7 月 PubMed、Embase、Medline 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库中的研究。纳入包含接受 CAR-T 细胞疗法后缓解持续时间(DoR)个体数据的研究。采用固定效应或随机效应模型计算合并缓解率。进行亚组分析以分析异质性,并采用 Cox 回归模型识别与持续疗效相关的因素。
共纳入 12 项研究,包括 69 例患者。合并复发率为 45%[95% CI 35,56]。复发率的亚组分析显示,使用 CD28/4-1BB 结构域的 CAR-T 细胞(CD28/4-1BB vs. CD28 vs. 4-1BB,p = 0.0151)、脑实质或软脑膜受累(脑实质或软脑膜 vs. 脑实质和软脑膜均受累,p < 0.0001),以及 CAR-T 细胞疗法联合治疗[自体干细胞移植(ASCT)联合 CAR-T 细胞疗法 vs. CAR-T 细胞联合维持治疗 vs. 单纯 CAR-T 细胞疗法,p = 0.003]与患者较低的复发率相关。使用重建的个体患者生存数据评估时间-事件终点,以探索 DoR 的关键调节因素。在CAR-T 输注时达到部分缓解状态以及使用ASCT联合CAR-T 细胞治疗与多因素水平上更长的DoR相关,风险比分别为0.25和0.26。
CAR-T 细胞治疗在CNSL患者中显示出有前景且持久的疗效。然而,需要进一步的前瞻性大规模研究来评估这些效应修饰因素,以优化患者选择并提高CAR-T 细胞治疗CNSL的持久疗效。系统评价注册:https://ClinicalTrials.gov/,标识符PROSPERO CRD42023451856。
Background: Central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is considered an aggressive lymphoma with a poor prognosis. Studies investigating CNSL have shown that chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has demonstrated an effective response in limited sample sizes.
Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the sustained efficacy and factors associated with the sustained efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in the treatment of CNSL. Methods: We searched studies from PubMed, Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials up to July 2023. Studies that included individual data on the duration of response (DoR) after receiving CAR T-cell therapy were enrolled. Pooled response rates were calculated using fixed-effects or random-effects models. Subgroup analysis was performed to analyze the heterogeneity, and a Cox regression model was performed to identify the factors associated with sustained efficacy. Results: In total, 12 studies including 69 patients were identified and included in this meta-analysis. The pooled relapse rate was 45% [95% CI 35, 56].
Subgroup analyses of relapse rates revealed that CAR T-cells using the CD28/4-1BB domain (CD28/4-1BB vs. CD28 vs. 4-1BB, p = 0. 0151), parenchymal or leptomeningeal involvement (parenchymal or leptomeningeal vs. both parenchymal and leptomeningeal, p < 0. 0001), and combined treatment with CAR T-cell therapy [Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) plus CAR T-cell therapy vs. CAR T cells with maintenance therapy vs. CAR T-cell therapy alone, p = 0.
003] were associated with lower relapse rates in patients. Time-to-event endpoints were assessed using reconstructed individual patient survival data to explore key modulators of DoR. Partial response status at CAR-T infusion and the use of ASCT plus CAR T-cell therapy were associated with longer DoR at the multivariate level, with hazard ratios of 0. 25 and 0. 26, respectively. Conclusion: CAR T-cell therapy shows promising and sustained efficacy in CNSL patients.
However, further prospective large-scale studies are needed to assess these effect modifiers to optimize patient selection and improve the sustained efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in the treatment of CNSL. Systematic review registration: https://clinicaltrials. gov/, identifier PROSPERO CRD42023451856.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。