CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Autologous stem cell transplant in fit patients with refractory or early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that responded to salvage chemotherapy.
Autologous stem cell transplant in fit patients with refractory or early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that responded to salvage chemotherapy.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CAR-T 细胞疗法是适合治疗的难治性或早期复发弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的新标准治疗。然而,在某些情况下(例如,缺乏CAR-T 细胞疗法的资源、化疗敏感性复发),挽救性化疗(ST)和自体干细胞移植(ASCT)可能仍有其作用。
我们回顾性研究了230例接受ST和ASCT的难治性或早期复发DLBCL患者。ST的中位线数为1(范围,1-3)。ASCT前的最佳缓解为完全缓解106例(46%)和部分缓解124例(54%)。ASCT后的中位随访时间为89.4个月。中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为16.1个月和43.3个月。在一线治疗后6至12个月之间复发的患者,其中位PFS(29.6个月)和OS(88.5个月)在数值上更优。需要一线ST的患者,与需要超过一线ST的患者相比,其中位PFS(37.9 vs. 3.9个月;P=0.0005)和OS(68.3 vs. 12.0个月;P=0.0005)更优。达到完全缓解的患者,其中位PFS(71.1 vs. 6.3个月;P<0.0001)和OS(110.3 vs. 18.9个月;P<0.0001)优于部分缓解的患者。在一线ST后达到完全缓解的患者,其中位PFS(88.5个月)和OS(117.2个月)最为有利。难治性或早期复发DLBCL患者ASCT后的生存结局似乎合理,并且在那些仅需一线ST即可在ASCT前达到完全缓解的患者中尤为有利,突显了该程序在特定化疗敏感性患者中的作用。
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is the new standard of care in fit patients with refractory or early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
However, there may still be a role for salvage chemotherapy (ST) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in certain circumstances (e. g. , lack of resources for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, chemosensitive relapses).
We retrospectively studied 230 patients with refractory or early relapsed DLBCL who underwent ST and ASCT. The median line of ST was one (range, 1-3). Best response before ASCT was complete response in 106 (46%) and partial response in 124 (54%) patients. The median follow-up after ASCT was 89. 4 months. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16. 1 and 43. 3 months, respectively. Patients relapsing between 6 to 12 months after frontline therapy had a numerically better median PFS (29. 6 months) and OS (88. 5 months). Patients who required one line of ST, compared to those requiring more than one line, had a better median PFS (37. 9 vs. 3.
9 months; P=0. 0005) and OS (68. 3 vs. 12. 0 months; P=0. 0005). Patients who achieved complete response had a better median PFS (71. 1 vs. 6. 3 months; P<0. 0001) and OS (110. 3 vs. 18. 9 months; P<0. 0001) than those in partial response. Patients who achieved complete response after one line of ST had the most favorable median PFS (88.
5 months) and OS (117. 2 months). Post-ASCT survival outcomes of patients with refractory or early relapsed DLBCL appeared reasonable and were particularly favorable in those who required only one line of ST to achieve complete response before ASCT, highlighting the role of this procedure in select patients with chemosensitive disease.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。